

|
Lädt ... Bride of New France (Original 2011; Ausgabe 2011)von Suzanne Desrochers
Werk-DetailsBride of New France von Suzanne Desrochers (2011)
I wasn't too impressed with this book. Partly it was because of the narrator who used a fake French accent that was very jarring. But mostly the story just didn't grab me. Laure lived in a hospital for homeless women in Paris. Conditions were horrible and one of her dormitory mates died of starvation. Laure dreamed of opening her own seamstress business and meeting a nobleman. She was extremely gifted at lacemaking and sewing so possibly she could have succeeded. However she came into conflict with the head of the hospital when she wrote a letter to the King about living conditions. Suddenly Laure was booked to go to New France to marry a settler. She ended up in Montreal and became friends with a young native man. Eventually she did marry but she was left for long periods by her husband. The native man brought her food and saved her. The next year, when her husband was away again, Laure and the young man had an affair. Inevitably Laure became pregnant. She gave up her daughter to the natives because otherwise it would be obvious to everyone that her husband was not the father. However, her husband died before she gave birth so I couldn't quite see why she had to relinquish the child. There are some interesting facts about life in New France as well as the situation of the poor in France. That was the redeeming feature of this book. In Bride of New France, Suzanne Desrochers presents a fascinating picture of women, especially poor women, in the 1600s. Their lack of options and their poor treatment at the hands of almost everyone will raise a reader's ire. Unfortunately, Laure's story is meant to be particularly poignant but rings slightly false given the surprisingly little character development. However, the descriptions of Paris and of the settlement of Quebec more than make up for the lapse in storytelling. This is better enjoyed from a historical perspective than it is for the overarching storyline. While it is definitely interesting, it is not necessarily one I would recommend to others. Historical novel of young French orphan sent to Canada to wed a French fur-trapper. keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
Literaturhinweise zu diesem Werk aus externen Quellen.
|
Google Books — Lädt ...
BewertungDurchschnitt: (3.36)
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Her hopes are dashed when one of her dorm mates falls ill and dies. Laure, who never like the girl, is shaken to her core and writes a letter to the king to ask for better and more food for the girls. For her trouble she is sent on the next boat to Canada as a Fille du roi.
Desrochers has given us a historical novel with a capital H, with this glimpse into the before and after life of one of the poor girls shipped from France in order to populate the colony. Laure and all the other poor waifs from Paris were malnourished, uneducated and without any of the skills needed for their new life. Yet, the roughness of the new land is softened a little bit (not by much) by the new found freedom. There is nobody watching over her anymore- no superiors , no police, not even any of the old social norms that used to keep the women in place in the old world. In Laure, Desrochers has painted us a picture of a young, bitter woman who was not happy with her lot in Paris and is definitely not happy to find herself in Canada, which rings true to my ears. Yet she survives and soldiers on even if she never really reconciles herself to her fate. The plot gathers speed when she gets to the new world and she meets a young native man who seems as between two worlds as herself. Yet, the new world has its own rules and Laure must follow them even if it goes against her own heart.
Did I enjoy this book? Yes, but...I am struggling to understand my own lukewarm reaction to it. Perhaps it is because, though Laure's bitterness was understandable, it made it hard to empathise with her. I never felt directly affected by her plight, but more as if I was reading the Typical Trajectory of a Filles du Roi for social studies class. Though I found it interesting enough to keep reading, all the visceral reactions you have when you are reading a good book were not there: I did not feel horrified when I should have felt horrified, I did not feel the terrible loneliness of her first winter though I know it was terribly lonely. I did not feel too bad or worried for Laure when she made her bad decisions.
Perhaps my humming and hawing comes from the fact that it probably would be a good compliment for a Social Studies Class. I just wish I liked it more than I did. (