Liked this book very much, mostly because it reads as an Alexander McCall Smith book with all his gentle philosophies. ( )

Not my cup of tea. Liked the original better ( )

I always enjoy Alexander McCall Smith's books and this was no exception. I would have liked it more had he made his Emma a little less rude and given Knightly a larger part in the story. ( )

This just isn’t feeling like a successful re-telling to me and I’m not really enjoying it. DNF around 40%

A folly is an ornamental structure to no purpose. Also an action that reveals a lack of good sense. Good intentions often lie behind such buildings and acts. Surely Mr McCall Smith must be especially fond of Jane Austen’s Emma else why even bother attempting this retelling. Our loves sometimes betray us. Here the contrast between McCall Smith’s Emma and Austen’s Emma lays bare his limitations as a writer even as it dramatically increases one’s appreciation for Austen’s subtle mastery of style and content. The only risk, if it counts as a risk, is that someone might come to this work without a prior appreciation for its source and might thereby be dissuaded from turning to Austen herself. Do make that turn; you will not be disappointed.

McCall Smith’s Emma is transposed to modern day and to Norfolk. There are, however, many touchpoints shared by this retelling and its source. Sometimes there is an anxiousness to cram these points of sameness into a single chapter, which leads to a bit of telling rather than showing. Sometimes what ought to be a touchpoint just marks the difference between the two. Alas.
Almost as disappointing are the number of typos, missing words and worse in this edition, despite being in a series released by a major publisher, Knopf. Alas.

Not recommended. But don’t let that put you off of McCall Smith’s other writings which are just fine. ( )