The surrender of Fort Sumter and the start of the Civil War . Fantastic book for history lover. ( )

KIRKUS:

A welcome addition to any Civil War buff’s library.

The bestselling author is back with an intriguing tale from the beginning of the Civil War.

In his latest appealing historical excavation, Larson, author of The Splendid and the Vile, Dead Wake, and other acclaimed books of popular history, examines the run-up to the Civil War during the six months between Lincoln’s November 1860 election and the surrender of Fort Sumter: a dismal period when bumblers, not excluding Lincoln, and fanatics dominated. People will fight for their freedom, but more will fight for their money, a fact that persuaded the Founding Fathers to continue the practice of slavery. Abolition became a major issue in the North early in the 19th century, enraging southerners. At the time, there was a widespread belief that Black men and women were fit for nothing better than being enslaved. All major southern religious traditions agreed, along with scholars, educators, journalists, and scientists. Most northerners agreed but hated that enslaved people worked for nothing; this depressed wages so there was opposition to slaves moving into territories and new states. Powerless before taking office, Lincoln vastly overestimated pro-Union sentiment in the South. He assured northern audiences that matters would calm down, believing (against all evidence) that secessionists were rational and that slavery in existing states was inviolate. Popular history demands a hero, so Larson concentrates on Maj. Robert Anderson, commander of the forts in Charleston harbor. Although he was a slaveowner, he did his duty, defending Fort Sumter until it became impossible and returning to the North to great acclaim. True to his style, Larson includes interesting portraits of obscure peripheral figures that enrich the narrative, including James Hammond, a wealthy but obnoxious planter and senator, and Mary Chesnut, wife of an even wealthier planter who kept an invaluable diary.

A welcome addition to any Civil War buff’s library.

In The Demon of Unrest, Erik Larson gives the history of the months leading up to the 1861attack on Fort Sumter seen as the opening salvo in the United States Civil War. I will admit to knowing only the bare bones of the attack or the war in general so I was excited whe I received an early copy from Netgalley and the publishers. I finished it a while ago but found writing this review difficult because I have mixed feeling about it.

On the plus side, Larson’s writing is clear, factual, well- researched and -documented including contemporaneous documents and letters, while avoiding the dry writing of most academic history, thus making it more interesting and easily accessible to everyone. And I must say, it is very interesting.

However, my problem with it is, as other reviewers have said, he gives us a great deal from the perspective of White slave holders but very little from Black people, whether enslaved or free. He documents some of the injustices and horrors inflicted on enslaved people but also some of the small kindnesses given them as well as showing them aiding in preparations for the attack. But the only actual Black voice we hear is that of Frederick Douglass, responding negatively to a speech by Lincoln which seemed meant to placate the South and this was followed by a more positive response from a Lexington lawyer who saw it as a judicial attempt at reconciliation. Interestingly, if it was, the South perceived it as hostility towards them.

I suspect Larson was trying to give a balanced and unbiased view of what can still be seen as an emotionally charged issue. The January 6th insurrection occurred while he was researching this book and he wondered about parallels. In fairness to Larson, this isn’t meant be one of those dry history tomes which, by the way, can also show biases, but I kind of felt, in his effort to be objective, he seems to give too much weight to the Southern perspective.

But that’s just me and my perspective may be skewed by being a non-American. Overall, despite these criticisms, I did quite enjoy reading this book. As I said, Larson makes history interesting, even fascinating and I found this book impossible to put down.

I received a copy of this book from Netgalley and Crown Publishing in exchange for an honest review ( )

very rare for me to read a non fiction book and give it 5 stars
a wonderful book ( )

I very much enjoyed learning about Fort Sumter. Raised as a southerner and loving southern literature, this story of the fort and the characters surrounding it fascinated me.

Erik Larson talks in the beginning about the January 6th insurrection and wondered about parallels. What causes people to latch onto an idea that becomes a person and a people's identity? What causes people to align with an idea so strongly that literally killing a person is justified? Larson introduces us to Abraham Lincoln, presenting a man with a sense of humor and a steel resolve to meet history where it stands. We meet southerners who believe in the myth of the south with their entire being, even willing to lose a son to the cause. I studied southern literature in college, and Larson touches upon several ideas that represent southern beliefs. I will say that it's impossible to completely understand the south from the outside. Even comments made by Larson and others during the novel show an inability to fully grasp the southern conflicts and paradoxes. Larson uses primary sources to tell the stories, from men to women, from southern to northern. It's through these sources that you see the southern ideas pull states together, leave the union, and choose to kill for those ideas. You also see the northerners as not completely understanding and believing unity is more important that southern ideas.

The southern myth of a beautiful society existing before the Civil War continues to create misunderstandings--at the least--and terrible, killing violence--at the worst. This novel gives a bit of an introduction to the idea and delves well into the messages and beliefs that caused Fort Sumter to be fired upon. It was historically educational yet sad to see the choices made that eventually led to a war amongst United States citizens that, in some ways, continues to be fought. It's well worth your time! ( )