Dagmar Barnouw (1936–2008)
Autor von The War in the Empty Air: Victims, Perpetrators, and Postwar Germans
Über den Autor
Dagmar Barnouw is Professor of German and Comparative Literature, University of Southern California.
Werke von Dagmar Barnouw
Zugehörige Werke
Getagged
Wissenswertes
- Gebräuchlichste Namensform
- Barnouw, Dagmar
- Geburtstag
- 1936-03-22
- Todestag
- 2008-05-14
- Geschlecht
- female
- Nationalität
- Deutschland (Geburt)
- Geburtsort
- Berlin-Wilmersdorf, Deutschland
- Sterbeort
- San Diego, California, USA
- Wohnorte
- Dresden, Germany
Ulm, Germany
San Diego, California, USA - Ausbildung
- Yale University (PhD German Literature)
- Berufe
- Professor
- Organisationen
- University of Southern California
- Preise und Auszeichnungen
- Guggenheim Fellowship
Fulbright Scholar - Kurzbiographie
- Dagmar Barnouw was born in Berlin, Germany. With her family, she survived the bombing of Dresden in the basement of their home. Afterwards, the family became refugees and fled west to the American zone to escape the Russian army.
They stayed in a series of small, muddy villages in northern Bavaria before moving to Ulm. In 1962, after earning an undergraduate degree in Germany, she came to the USA as a Fulbright Scholar at Stanford University. The following year, while returning to Germany, she met Jeffrey Barnouw, her future husband, with whom she later had a son. She earned her PhD in German literature at Yale University in 1968 and taught at several universities, including the University of Heidelberg; Purdue University; the University of Pittsburgh; Brown University; and the University of Texas at Austin.
She joined the faculty of the University of Southern California in 1988 as a professor of German and comparative literature. During her career, she wrote about 150 papers and published 12 books on topics ranging from the cultural politics of Thomas Mann to feminist and utopian science fiction.
Post-World War II Germany was a recurring theme, and her last book was War in the Empty Air: Victims, Perpetrators, and Postwar Germans (2005).
Mitglieder
Rezensionen
Dir gefällt vielleicht auch
Nahestehende Autoren
Statistikseite
- Werke
- 9
- Auch von
- 1
- Mitglieder
- 78
- Beliebtheit
- #229,022
- Bewertung
- 2.7
- Rezensionen
- 1
- ISBNs
- 21
- Sprachen
- 1
Barnouw goes to great lengths to promote what she sees as an alternative to the traditional reading of postwar Germany and its people. She wants their suffering acknowledged and the common postwar reading of German attitudes as "arrogant, indifferent, and unvanquished" to be seen as "stunned, fearful, and unsure" of the future. How she goes about it is taking the postwar still photos of US Army Signal Corps photographers, professional celebrity photographers (such as Robert Capa and Margaret Bourke-White) and German photographers and re-visioning them to demonstrate her thesis. Unfortunately, in doing so, she takes an entirely subjective point of view in her analyses. Her examination of the photos can easily be read from a different perspective. And her formal analysis, which eschews the critical language of photographic analysis, is often simply wrong. The composition and line of sight and vectoring of photos does not lead where she says it does. And she inadequately deals with issues of foregrounding, perspectivism, vanishing points, depth of field, and off camera space, all of which are missing entirely from her work. Finally, she fails to examine just what drove, for example, US Army photographic units' rules of composition and framing. There was no exploration of army field manuals, technical manuals, or equipment manuals pertaining to Signal Corps photography. She does not seem to realize that the first army manual on this subject actually predates the Spanish-American War. Instead, Barnouw creates stories. Some of them are intriguing and appealing. But much of it is imagined in her head and present no place else.
A final word on the Historikerstreit. There seems to be some sort of consensus that the study of Nazi Germany has always revolved around the Holocaust, at least until the so-called conflict among German historians beginning in the mid 1980s. I think this is a misreading and that Barnouw is forgetting the initial studies on the topic that were dominant from the late 1940s until the mid 1970s, when, indeed, there was a shift to what Barnouw would call transhistorical centering on the Holocaust. But before that, historians such as Gerhard Ritter, Edmond Vermeil, Alan Bullock, Gordon Craig, Henry Ashby Turner, Jr., Wolfgang Sauer, and even Ralf Dahrendorf and David Schoenbaum were concentrated on the How and Why of Nazism, not the Holocaust itself. Barnouw makes no mention of these historians or their positions and theses. For that, her work seems fundamentally flawed.… (mehr)