Bobby Duffy
Autor von The Perils of Perception: Why We’re Wrong About Nearly Everything
Über den Autor
Bildnachweis: Atlantic Books
Werke von Bobby Duffy
Getagged
Wissenswertes
- Geburtstag
- 20th century
- Geschlecht
- male
- Land (für Karte)
- United Kingdom
- Berufe
- professor
Mitglieder
Rezensionen
Anyone who has spent even a little time on social media has seen a whole lot of signs suggesting there's a huge battle brewing between the generations - Gen Z is lazy; Millennials are whiners who, if they cut back on the avocado toast, could have it all; Gen X, if you can find anything about them at all, are selfish; and Boomers have ruined, well, everything. The pre-war generations hardly exist at all except as honorary Boomers.
In The Generation Myth: Why When You're Born Matters Less Than You Think, author Bobby Duffy challenges these myths. He calls them lazy thinking and the equivalent of using astrology to define the generations and he backs it up with plenty of documentation and statistics. Yes, he says that when we are born does have an effect on our attitudes but not as much as other factors like the economy e.g. the 2008 Recession or the country in which you were born e.g. religion has a much great effect on attitudes across generations in the US than in the UK and, of course, our families and disasters like Covid-19.
In fact, according to Duffy, attitudes toward such issues as racism, gay marriage, abortion, immigration, and climate change have changed over a short period of time for both Boomers and Gen X and are now closer to those of Millennials and Gen Z than to the pre-war generations where attitudes have remained flat. This is not to say the Duffy doesn't think generational thinking isn't important. As he says about writing this book:
This is not because I don't see any value in generational thinking but the opposite: it's too important, particularly right now, to be left to these misdirections. Its importance is not because I see an impending, inevitable crisis or all-out generational war, but because we seen to have lost faith in a better future for our current and future generations of young people. That's risky, and in many ways, it sums up the challenge of our world in the wake of Covid-19. An understanding of generations, including what brings us together as much as what separates us, is vital to our response.
A well-documented book about an increasingly important subject given the times we live in but a surprisingly hopeful one and I recommend it highly.
Thanks to Netgalley & Perseus Books for the opportunity to read this book in exchange for an honest review… (mehr)
In The Generation Myth: Why When You're Born Matters Less Than You Think, author Bobby Duffy challenges these myths. He calls them lazy thinking and the equivalent of using astrology to define the generations and he backs it up with plenty of documentation and statistics. Yes, he says that when we are born does have an effect on our attitudes but not as much as other factors like the economy e.g. the 2008 Recession or the country in which you were born e.g. religion has a much great effect on attitudes across generations in the US than in the UK and, of course, our families and disasters like Covid-19.
In fact, according to Duffy, attitudes toward such issues as racism, gay marriage, abortion, immigration, and climate change have changed over a short period of time for both Boomers and Gen X and are now closer to those of Millennials and Gen Z than to the pre-war generations where attitudes have remained flat. This is not to say the Duffy doesn't think generational thinking isn't important. As he says about writing this book:
This is not because I don't see any value in generational thinking but the opposite: it's too important, particularly right now, to be left to these misdirections. Its importance is not because I see an impending, inevitable crisis or all-out generational war, but because we seen to have lost faith in a better future for our current and future generations of young people. That's risky, and in many ways, it sums up the challenge of our world in the wake of Covid-19. An understanding of generations, including what brings us together as much as what separates us, is vital to our response.
A well-documented book about an increasingly important subject given the times we live in but a surprisingly hopeful one and I recommend it highly.
Thanks to Netgalley & Perseus Books for the opportunity to read this book in exchange for an honest review… (mehr)
1 
lostinalibrary | 1 weitere Rezension | Nov 10, 2021 |
lostinalibrary | 1 weitere Rezension | Nov 10, 2021 | 
Best for:
People wondering how on earth everyone else can have such misconstrued ideas (hint: you do too!).
In a nutshell:
Author Duffy explores areas in which people tend to vastly over- or underestimate facts, and why that might be.
Worth quoting:
“Our misperceptions can provide clues to what we’re most worried about - and where we’re not as worries as we should be.”
Why I chose it:
I’ve known that I — and others — will often overestimate how bad things are, or underestimate how good things are, and that often in the face of facts that don’t match our beliefs, people will just … double down. I wanted to learn more about why that is.
Review:
There is a lot going on in this book, and I won’t be able to do it all justice, so I hope if the topic interests you you’ll consider checking it out. But here is my attempt!
Have you seen “Sleepless in Seattle”? I have. It’s one of my favorite films. There’s a scene near the beginning, where Meg Ryan’s character Annie is in the office talking with her colleagues about that statistic about how a woman over 40 is more likely to be killed by a terrorist than to get married. And Annie says that the statistic is not true, and Rosie O’Donnell’s character Becky responds with “That’s right, it’s not true. But it feels true.”
So much of what we get wrong about facts stem from this idea. If it feels like, say murders are on the rise (perhaps because you see murders reported on the news each night), or members of a certain religion are immigrating to your country in large numbers (because many politicians keep pointing out the locations of their houses of worship as a threat to their idea of the dominant culture), you might not believe it when people tell you that murders are down, or the population of that specific religion in your country is about five times less than your guess.
Duffy discusses this, as well as the idea that our errors in answering questions about verifiable facts often reflects our worries. We might overestimate how much of our nation’s budget goes to foreign aid (extremely small amount) by dozens of percentage point because we fear that not enough money is being spent at home. We might overestimate violent crime because we are worried about walking home in our own neighborhood at night. We are factually wrong, but our perceptions are based in our emotions, and those are hard things to adjust.
This book looks at other reasons why we are so wrong - including that we think other people are more like us than they actually are - but I found those two aspects the most compelling.
I was also intrigued by the fact that while there are definitely issues with the spread of bad information on social media, we aren’t necessarily more poorly informed than we were, say, 80 years ago. Our perceptions are generally pretty bad all the time - but perhaps now people are noticing it more.
The book ends with ten suggestions for how we can improve our own perceptions and understanding of the world. My favorite was ‘Accept the emotion, but challenge the thought.’ I might hear a statistic or fact that goes against my beliefs. And its okay to have a reaction to that. But then I need to start thinking through it critically and explore why I’m having the reaction I’m having, what it means if that fact is correct, and how my values and worldview are impacted by that, instead of just saying ‘that can’t be right, I don’t believe it.’
Keep it / Pass to a Friend / Donate it / Toss it:
Donate it… (mehr)
People wondering how on earth everyone else can have such misconstrued ideas (hint: you do too!).
In a nutshell:
Author Duffy explores areas in which people tend to vastly over- or underestimate facts, and why that might be.
Worth quoting:
“Our misperceptions can provide clues to what we’re most worried about - and where we’re not as worries as we should be.”
Why I chose it:
I’ve known that I — and others — will often overestimate how bad things are, or underestimate how good things are, and that often in the face of facts that don’t match our beliefs, people will just … double down. I wanted to learn more about why that is.
Review:
There is a lot going on in this book, and I won’t be able to do it all justice, so I hope if the topic interests you you’ll consider checking it out. But here is my attempt!
Have you seen “Sleepless in Seattle”? I have. It’s one of my favorite films. There’s a scene near the beginning, where Meg Ryan’s character Annie is in the office talking with her colleagues about that statistic about how a woman over 40 is more likely to be killed by a terrorist than to get married. And Annie says that the statistic is not true, and Rosie O’Donnell’s character Becky responds with “That’s right, it’s not true. But it feels true.”
So much of what we get wrong about facts stem from this idea. If it feels like, say murders are on the rise (perhaps because you see murders reported on the news each night), or members of a certain religion are immigrating to your country in large numbers (because many politicians keep pointing out the locations of their houses of worship as a threat to their idea of the dominant culture), you might not believe it when people tell you that murders are down, or the population of that specific religion in your country is about five times less than your guess.
Duffy discusses this, as well as the idea that our errors in answering questions about verifiable facts often reflects our worries. We might overestimate how much of our nation’s budget goes to foreign aid (extremely small amount) by dozens of percentage point because we fear that not enough money is being spent at home. We might overestimate violent crime because we are worried about walking home in our own neighborhood at night. We are factually wrong, but our perceptions are based in our emotions, and those are hard things to adjust.
This book looks at other reasons why we are so wrong - including that we think other people are more like us than they actually are - but I found those two aspects the most compelling.
I was also intrigued by the fact that while there are definitely issues with the spread of bad information on social media, we aren’t necessarily more poorly informed than we were, say, 80 years ago. Our perceptions are generally pretty bad all the time - but perhaps now people are noticing it more.
The book ends with ten suggestions for how we can improve our own perceptions and understanding of the world. My favorite was ‘Accept the emotion, but challenge the thought.’ I might hear a statistic or fact that goes against my beliefs. And its okay to have a reaction to that. But then I need to start thinking through it critically and explore why I’m having the reaction I’m having, what it means if that fact is correct, and how my values and worldview are impacted by that, instead of just saying ‘that can’t be right, I don’t believe it.’
Keep it / Pass to a Friend / Donate it / Toss it:
Donate it… (mehr)
Listen
Yet another list (1)
Statistikseite
- Werke
- 8
- Mitglieder
- 142
- Beliebtheit
- #144,865
- Bewertung
- 3.6
- Rezensionen
- 3
- ISBNs
- 23
- Sprachen
- 3
debunking common myths about generational cohorts using various data from UK and US - I can't say I always agree with which data the author chooses to focus attention on, but there is a lot in here that I found thought provoking, and certainly most of these issues are likely much more complex than people realize.
It was also a lot longer than I cared to read/listen to, though at least I could follow along without having to look at the various charts and graphs (provided in a downloadable pdf with the audiobook). Overall, not bad--just not really ideal for my short attention span. Recommended for people who like statistics.… (mehr)