D. D. Guttenplan
Autor von Der Holocaust-Prozess. Die Hintergründe der "Auschwitz-Lüge".
Über den Autor
D. D. Guttenplan, journalist and essayist, lives in London.
Werke von D. D. Guttenplan
Once Off 1 Exemplar
Zugehörige Werke
Getagged
Wissenswertes
- Rechtmäßiger Name
- Guttenplan, Don David
- Geburtstag
- 1957-07-12
- Geschlecht
- male
- Nationalität
- USA
- Geburtsort
- Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
- Ausbildung
- Columbia College (BA)
Cambridge University (Clare College) (BA)
University of London (PhD) - Organisationen
- The Nation
National Union of Journalists
American Historical Association
Friends of Music at Guilford
Mitglieder
Rezensionen
Processo all'Olocausto von D. D. Guttemplan
L'11 gennaio 2000, di fronte alla Royal Court di Londra, inizia il processo che vede protagonisti lo storico revisionista David Irving contro la ricercatrice americana Deborah Lipstadt, accusata di averlo calunniato. La causa si trasforma presto in un processo sul genocidio. (fonte: Google Books)
Update - Re-read in 2016. Love Guttenplan's even handedness and analysis about the issues. Honesty, this is a really good overview of the trial.
This book is about the Irving vs. Penguin/Lipstadt trial, but unlike Evans, this account is written from an outsider’s point of view. This allows the reader to have both a look at all the sides and the way the wheels of the trial were moving. It is reporting in the sense of the word with a look at what should be done if anything about denial, and placing the trial in content for a non-participate. And while it doesn’t answer the question it raises, it does raise an important one. Lipstadt was sued because the libel laws in England are not as favorable to the writer as they are in say America. But it also allows for the voicing of hateful and hurtful words. That whole sticks and stone rhyme, bullshit. Complete and other bullshit. Nothing hurts more than words.… (mehr)
This book is about the Irving vs. Penguin/Lipstadt trial, but unlike Evans, this account is written from an outsider’s point of view. This allows the reader to have both a look at all the sides and the way the wheels of the trial were moving. It is reporting in the sense of the word with a look at what should be done if anything about denial, and placing the trial in content for a non-participate. And while it doesn’t answer the question it raises, it does raise an important one. Lipstadt was sued because the libel laws in England are not as favorable to the writer as they are in say America. But it also allows for the voicing of hateful and hurtful words. That whole sticks and stone rhyme, bullshit. Complete and other bullshit. Nothing hurts more than words.… (mehr)
Introduction is a superior essay on What We Think We Know.
Dir gefällt vielleicht auch
Nahestehende Autoren
Statistikseite
- Werke
- 6
- Auch von
- 2
- Mitglieder
- 226
- Beliebtheit
- #99,470
- Bewertung
- 3.6
- Rezensionen
- 6
- ISBNs
- 18
- Sprachen
- 3