Autorenbild.

Über den Autor

R. Jay Magill Jr. is an independent scholar, journalist, and illustrator living in Berlin. The author of Chic Ironic Bitterness (2007), his work has appeared in, among others, The American Interest, The Atlantic, The Believer, Foreign Policy, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the mehr anzeigen Boston Globe. weniger anzeigen

Werke von R. Jay Magill Jr.

Getagged

Wissenswertes

Rechtmäßiger Name
Magill, Ronald Jay, Jr.
Geburtstag
1972-01-02
Geschlecht
male
Kurzbiographie
R. Jay Magill, Jr. is an independent scholar, essayist, and illustrator
living in Berlin, where he works for the American Academy as a
writer and editor.

His work has appeared in a variety of American and German publications, including the American Prospect, American Interest, Atlantic Monthly, The Believer, Boston Globe, Deutschland Radio, Foreign Policy, The New York Times, Print, Spiegel Online, Tagesspiegel, and Weltkunst. He is the staff caricaturist for The American Interest, a book reviewer for the Wall Street Journal, and the host of a radio show on NPR Berlin/Worldwide.

Magill is the author of two books: Chic Ironic Bitterness (Michigan, 2007), winner of a 2008 Eric Hoffer Notable Book in Culture Award and nominated for the 2008 Ralph Waldo Emerson Award, and Sincerity: How A Moral Ideal Born Five Hundred Years Ago Inspired Religious Wars, Modern Art, Hipster Chic, and the Curious Notion that We All Have Something to Say (No Matter How Dull) (W.W. Norton, 2012), which was chosen as both a New York Times Editors' Choice and a Wall Street Journal Top-Ten Nonfiction Book of 2012.

Magill holds a PhD in American Studies from the University of Hamburg, an MA in art history and philosophy from Stony Brook University, and a BFA/BA in painting, drawing, and philosophy from Kutztown University, in Pennsylvania. He has taught at the University of Lüneburg and at Harvard University, where he received a 2001 Derek Bok Award for Distinction in Teaching.

A Philadelphia native, Magill lives with his wife and son in the Schöneberg neighborhood of Berlin.

http://www.rjaymagill.com/about.html

Mitglieder

Rezensionen

While some of the historical aspects raised by Magill did make for some interesting reading, the whole book - except for the 11 page epilogue - really read like a research paper, filled with third party quotes. It isn't until the epilogue where we finally get to read Magill's opinion. The only quote I found worthy of mentioning here is the following broad declaration of insincerity:
"Insincerity pretends toward a democratic sympathy while engaging in aristocratic deceit."
Basically the 500 year recap of sincerity is that sincerity has oscillated along a linear spectrum. Some decades/centuries saw an embrace of sincerity as the norm. Other decades/centuries saw sincerity as a way to rebel against societal norms (the hipster chic of the 1980's-1990's). These oscillations include eras where insincerity/being radically superficial was the norm, such as late seventeenth-century France and America in the 1950's to the over indulgence in what some individuals view as sincerity with over exposure to Oprah, Dr. Phil, Jerry Springer, Howard Stern, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. As Magill correctly points out, society would never survive in an environment that exists at either end of the sincerity/insincerity spectrum:
"A world without any sincerity would embody the X-Files motto, Trust no one. Now imagine the exact opposite, a world where everyone was sincere all the time. Everyone would always say exactly what they were thinking or feeling, regardless of its unwantedness, inappropriateness, inaccuracy, relation to truth, poor entertainment value or consequences..."
For society to function on a level that does not provide for a miserable existence, we need to allow sincerity and insincerity to coexist. Sincerity, as an individual act, is something that is subject to personal to the personal evaluation of the individual. Yes, there will always be individuals who are more or less sincere then we may like, and that is when society, as a collective, should be able to maintain the middle path to the benefit of all.

Overall, an okay research-laden read but if you are strapped for time, you can pretty much just jump to the end and read the 11-page epilogue and forego wading through 221-pages of 500 years of history. At the half way mark while reading this one I couldn't help but think that the rather long title is an apt one, especially the last bit about we ALL have something to say (no matter how dull).
… (mehr)
½
 
Gekennzeichnet
lkernagh | 1 weitere Rezension | Mar 5, 2017 |
Interesting and provocative with some nice touches of snarky humor. More erudite than I expected.
 
Gekennzeichnet
Sullywriter | 1 weitere Rezension | May 22, 2015 |
Perhaps a little self-indulgent for those of us in our 20s and 30s, Magill uses pop references (from VH1 to the Daily Show to Dave Eggers and the Onion) and philosophy's usual suspects to argue that the wide-spread ironically bitter attitude afflicting so many of us today is not an indicator of detachment, but a defense mechanism to protect personal integrity in a screwed-up world. -Emily
 
Gekennzeichnet
skylightbooks | Feb 6, 2008 |

Statistikseite

Werke
2
Mitglieder
73
Beliebtheit
#240,526
Bewertung
½ 3.5
Rezensionen
3
ISBNs
6

Diagramme & Grafiken