Autorenbild.

Robert Scholes

Autor von The Nature of Narrative

45+ Werke 1,468 Mitglieder 17 Rezensionen Lieblingsautor von 1 Lesern

Über den Autor

Robert Scholes is Research Professor of Modern Culture and Media at Brown University. He is the author of many books of literary theory. (Bowker Author Biography)
Bildnachweis: Brown University

Werke von Robert Scholes

The Nature of Narrative (1966) 157 Exemplare
Semiotics and Interpretation (1982) 69 Exemplare
Protocols of Reading (1989) 66 Exemplare
Elements of Fiction (1968) — Herausgeber — 64 Exemplare
The Practice of Writing (1981) 60 Exemplare
The Crafty Reader (2001) 56 Exemplare
Writing through Literature (2001) 34 Exemplare
Structural Fabulation (1975) 26 Exemplare
Paradoxy of Modernism (2006) 22 Exemplare
Elements of Poetry (1765) 20 Exemplare
Elements of Drama (1971) 16 Exemplare
FABULATION & METAFICTION (1979) 12 Exemplare
Some Modern Writers (1971) 7 Exemplare
In Search of James Joyce (1992) 6 Exemplare
The fabulators (1967) 6 Exemplare
Elements of Writing (1656) 5 Exemplare
Elements of the essay (1969) 4 Exemplare

Zugehörige Werke

Dubliner (1914) — Herausgeber, einige Ausgaben19,676 Exemplare
Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama (1995) — Mitwirkender, einige Ausgaben917 Exemplare
Einführung in die fantastische Literatur (1970) — Einführung, einige Ausgaben447 Exemplare
Der Tag vor der Revolution und andere »Nebula«-Preis-Stories 6 (1975) — Mitwirkender, einige Ausgaben106 Exemplare
Science Fiction: A Collection of Critical Essays (1976) — Autor — 37 Exemplare
Future Females: A Critical Anthology (1981) — Mitwirkender — 17 Exemplare
Studies in Bibliography (Vol. 16) (1963) — Mitwirkender; Mitwirkender, einige Ausgaben2 Exemplare
Studies in Bibliography (Vol. 17) — Mitwirkender — 2 Exemplare
Studies in Bibliography (Vol. 15) — Mitwirkender — 2 Exemplare

Getagged

Wissenswertes

Mitglieder

Rezensionen

Nims on late Yeats is particularly good, and Hugh Kenner's "Art in a Closed Field" is a concise and entertaining summary of his views on the links between aesthetics and technology. Today it reads like a modernist response to prophets of interactive fiction and other post-modern devices.
½
 
Gekennzeichnet
jwm24 | Aug 3, 2013 |
Diese Rezension wurde für LibraryThing Early Reviewers geschrieben.
I really appreciated Scholes's consideration of the place of the English Department in an academic world that's increasingly about students studying the practical, the career-oriented. On the one hand, I agree with him that the teaching of reading and the teaching of writing retain a significant importance, even if we become more and more a "service" department. I agree that the modernist privileging of difficult works needs to be dethroned, and that cultural studies should become an important part of what English departments do. On the other, many of his examples struck me as quixotic in the extreme, to the point of derailing his arguments. The first few chapters are absolutely the strongest.… (mehr)
 
Gekennzeichnet
chelseagirl | 10 weitere Rezensionen | Jun 13, 2012 |
Diese Rezension wurde für LibraryThing Early Reviewers geschrieben.
In this slim volume, Scholes presents his plea for the continuing relevance of the humanities as both a body of scholarship and a uniquely powerful tool for understanding and sorting the information with which we are daily saturated. Scholes deftly analyzes of a variety of different forms, from scripture to opera, in defense of his position that textuality -- what people really read and write -- rather than literature, should be the proper object of instruction in literature courses.
 
Gekennzeichnet
dianegreco | 10 weitere Rezensionen | Mar 6, 2012 |
Diese Rezension wurde für LibraryThing Early Reviewers geschrieben.
LibraryThing user dekesolomon's review of English After the Fall is succinct and accurate - unlike Scholes' own treatise on the evolution of English studies. The premise of Robert Scholes' text is one I certainly agree with - he identifies a need for English department to evolve, both for their own survival and for the benefit of students. As one of the "lowly" adjuncts both Scholes and Deke identify, I have very strong opinions about the state of compositional studies, and some specific ideas about how to change things for the good of all; I do not think Scholes would agree with many of my assessments.

Scholes suggests that the way to extend the life of English departments is to look beyond the traditional canon and recognize other genres as texts worthy of study. This would likely have been a radical idea twenty years ago, but my own experiences as a student suggest that Scholes is behind the curve; I, for example, took courses on Japanese theatre, contemporary fiction, American travel narratives, and a host of other genres that are traditionally "nonliterary" as an undergraduate, and continue to use "nonliterary" sources in my own courses. Much of Scholes' arguments are lost in his enthusiasm for specific texts, and for a reader unfamiliar with the operas and films on which he fixates, his text as a whole loses its power.

Whiles Scholes certainly identifies many of the problems now facing English departments, his "solution" seems to aggravate many of the current difficulties of teaching the subject by continuing to present material that undergraduates will not find compelling (i.e. opera), as opposed to addressing some of the most immediate concerns: a need for students to learn how to communicate effectively, whether or not they pursue English courses beyond the requirements of Freshman Composition.
… (mehr)
 
Gekennzeichnet
London_StJ | 10 weitere Rezensionen | Jan 2, 2012 |

Auszeichnungen

Dir gefällt vielleicht auch

Nahestehende Autoren

Statistikseite

Werke
45
Auch von
9
Mitglieder
1,468
Beliebtheit
#17,499
Bewertung
3.9
Rezensionen
17
ISBNs
97
Sprachen
3
Favoriten
1

Diagramme & Grafiken