D. R. Thorpe (1943–2023)
Autor von Supermac: The Life of Harold Macmillan
Über den Autor
Werke von D. R. Thorpe
Who's In, Who's Out: The Journals of Kenneth Rose: Volume One 1944-1979 (2018) — Herausgeber — 14 Exemplare
Getagged
Wissenswertes
- Rechtmäßiger Name
- Thorpe, David Richard
- Geburtstag
- 1943-03-12
- Todestag
- 2023-02-02
- Geschlecht
- male
- Nationalität
- UK
- Geburtsort
- Huddersfield, Yorkshire, England, UK
- Ausbildung
- Fettes College, Edinburgh
Cambridge University (Selwyn College) - Berufe
- schoolmaster (Charterhouse)
historian
biographer
Mitglieder
Rezensionen
Auszeichnungen
Statistikseite
- Werke
- 7
- Mitglieder
- 125
- Beliebtheit
- #160,151
- Bewertung
- 3.5
- Rezensionen
- 4
- ISBNs
- 12
Rose mentions the diaries of both Chips Channon and James Lees-Milne, which are better known diaries from at least some of this period. However, Rose's diary is rather different from those – much less about himself (although his kindness and somewhat delicate character come out) and much more about the people he is talking about. His opinion of those other two diarists is not high – at one point he describes Channon as 'stupid' although he does allow that the diaries (then available only in the expurgated form - I wonder what he would have made of the more recent full version) give a good insight into society; as for Lees-Milne, he is beyond the pale.
The best part of Rose's work is probably the many funny stories about famous people he retells. This is a very funny book. It also is a useful corrective for the reputation of some people now regarded in a somewhat negative light. Selwyn Lloyd is an example of this and rather differently, Jeremy Thorpe.
Rose knew some of the royal family well, others less so. He is a sympathetic writer about them but not an uncritical one.
This is also a very depressing book in a way, because it shows that there are so many people in positions of power through their education and social status rather than ability. This applies almost as much to the left wing as the right.
Although in general well edited, the volume has curious footnotes. Sometimes basic information on the same person is repeated in another footnote further on; and some of the footnotes do not adequately explain context for readers with less knowledge of the times. It is also irritating that the footnotes have symbols rather than numbers, so that you have to look carefully to find the right one.… (mehr)