Non-Fiction Worth Reading

Beschreibung
Obviously different people have different ideas of what makes a book worth reading. But for you personally, was it worth the time it took to read?
1
14,615 Mitglieder
739 Rezensionen
4.2
Globaler Rang 3
40 Members
adsddy, schmootc, lquilter, _Zoe_, kageeh, Minthe, booksinbed, chellerystick, norabelle414, EmScape, chgstrom, jdyork74, SylviaC, edparks, cataloga, indigorising, susiesharp, souloftherose, Jenni_Canuck, sssolstice, Jennine, pltgsage, rozymary, cej1027, gypsysmom, trisarahdactyl, ahef1963, kara.shamy, rosskobayashi, dianeham, This-n-That, msemmag, satyr76, EasyIndy, TwinDaddy, steller0707, Elias3, kay.emme, Charon07, carolmaren,eromsted , , , ,Sharkie35
Erklärungen
Sharkie35 : The way they used her cells was nothing unique, or based on her race. The author glosses over these facts so they could write a book proclaiming the medical profession as racist.
2
9,925 Mitglieder
229 Rezensionen
½ 4.4
Globaler Rang 61
4
3,522 Mitglieder
141 Rezensionen
4.2
Globaler Rang 120
5
6,417 Mitglieder
268 Rezensionen
4.1
Globaler Rang 110
8
23,227 Mitglieder
398 Rezensionen
4.2
Globaler Rang 12
22 Members
HollyBoggie, chgstrom, Legalrealist, spyrunner, Navarone, briarhills, smasler, peterveen, leonja, gypsysmom, ahef1963, kerrygiven, Lurchador, anotherwise, Letz.Go, lib0233, hdlane, valeneayar, msemmag, IraTozer, bpmoss, izzy45,lorax ,
Erklärungen
lorax: An error-ridden mess complete with random gratuitous homophobia. Read it for the biographies, but don't believe the science if you didn't already know it (and maybe not even then, if you believe that glass flows.)
9
23,712 Mitglieder
466 Rezensionen
4.1
Globaler Rang 11
11
4,340 Mitglieder
197 Rezensionen
4.2
Globaler Rang 48
12
2,959 Mitglieder
93 Rezensionen
3.9
Globaler Rang 160
13
12,211 Mitglieder
594 Rezensionen
½ 4.4
Globaler Rang 70