Dieses Thema ruht momentan. Die letzte Nachricht liegt mehr als 90 Tage zurück. Du kannst es wieder aufgreifen, indem du eine neue Antwort schreibst.
Here's his CV
This is going to be quite the deal. I'm assuming his Harvard, Cambridge and Blackwell books go poof. But any study of Roman sexuality, and some specific topics in Roman poetry, are going to need to cite the guy. Can his arguments about sexuality, modern and ancient, be pried loose from his sexual predation (and online comments about it)?
Anyway, check out the first link. Much to think about.
My first perhaps simplistic response is that good scholarship out not be discarded because of the biography of the scholar. Much like that most would not refuse to listen to Miles Davis because of his abuse of women, and so many other examples. But the relationship between his research and his activities demands a reckoning itself. Maybe in the psychology department...
She also thinks Parker's writings are so fundamentally important that they are indispensable to any classical education. If that is so then she will be required to go on citing and assigning them no matter what. But it is not so and she won't be. If she is uncomfortable with them, she can just bypass them. The Classics will survive. Parker's writings will also survive, if they inherently deserve to. Other less concerned instructors and scholars will continue to refer to them.
The fear that reference in a scholarly paper to an academic work makes one complicit in any sexual aberrations of its author is just sort of weird.