Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... Staring at the Sun (Picador Books) (Original 1986; 2005. Auflage)von Julian Barnes
Werk-InformationenIn die Sonne sehen von Julian Barnes (1986)
Keine Lädt ...
Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest. Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. https://nwhyte.livejournal.com/3834524.html What's it about? In fact only the third (and shortest) section of three is set in 2022, and even that is a bit ambiguous in that the year is never identified, though 2022 seems a reasonable best fit given what we are told earlier in the book. The first section deals with the childhood of the protagonist in the 1940s; the second with her unsuccessful marriage to the village policeman; and the third flashes back to her life in between from the perspective of celebrating her hundredth birthday. Is 2022 really going to be like that? I do hope that 100-year-old ladies will still be able to have joyrides in aeroplanes next year, if they want to. And Barnes' supercomputer with all the answers is not far off Google, though it requires a lot more human maintenance than the search algorithms that we have come to know and love in real life. Is it any good? Unambiguously, yes. I don't think it is as deep and meaningful as Julian Barnes fans evidently do, but it's an interesting reflection on what the life of an Englishwoman born in 1942 might look like. 3.80 Just like many of Barnes' books, this one is divided into three chapters which tell a story of a woman named Jean and her life from the 1920s to the year of 2020. To be honest, I didn't like the start nor the first third of the book. So I was really bored and contemplated giving up several times. But then came the second third which was really interesting. The third chapter is set in the future. Certainly, the year of 2020 was a distant future when this was written back in 1986, but it's pretty much now. I'm surprised to see that Barnes accurately predicted the rise of Wikipedia. The only thing he got wrong is the founding year. Wikipedia was actually founded in 2001. not 1998, but he was still surprisingly close. The really important questions do not have answers: and the really important answers do not need questions. Life is itself, not comparable to anything. And all the great miracles are present in the here and the now, if only we can see them... like staring at the sun through the gap between your fingers. ...Some of the things which I took away from this magical, unreviewable book. Read it.
Access to the General Purposes Computer is by keying in one's social security number, and output "modified to your level of understanding", in dialogue form. ... Replies can be stern - NOT REAL QUESTION and CLASSIFIED are frequent responses to the would-be researcher hero of the book ... Cynics observed that the only things you couldn't ask GPC about were its own input, sources, principles and personnel.... It is a chilling section to read - after ADONIS, what? one uneasily speculates. Julian Barnes foresees a wholly Orwellian amassing and control of information, extrapolating from the databanks and online services then available. Prestigeträchtige Auswahlen
Die Liebes- und Emanzipationsgeschichte einer Engländerin - von der Vorkriegszeit bis zu ihrem 100. Lebensjahr im Jahre 2020.. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeineBeliebte Umschlagbilder
Google Books — Lädt ... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)823.914Literature English & Old English literatures English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1945-1999Klassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
A boomerang book: Didn’t care for the book the first time, read it too fast, much better the second reading. ( )