StartseiteGruppenForumMehrZeitgeist
Web-Site durchsuchen
Diese Seite verwendet Cookies für unsere Dienste, zur Verbesserung unserer Leistungen, für Analytik und (falls Sie nicht eingeloggt sind) für Werbung. Indem Sie LibraryThing nutzen, erklären Sie dass Sie unsere Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie gelesen und verstanden haben. Die Nutzung unserer Webseite und Dienste unterliegt diesen Richtlinien und Geschäftsbedingungen.

Ergebnisse von Google Books

Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.

Prisons We Choose to Live Inside von Doris…
Lädt ...

Prisons We Choose to Live Inside (Original 1987; 2013. Auflage)

von Doris Lessing (Autor)

MitgliederRezensionenBeliebtheitDurchschnittliche BewertungDiskussionen
422759,106 (3.61)14
"One of the most important writers of the past hundred years." --The Times (London) In this perceptive collection of essays, Doris Lessing addresses directly the prime questions before us all: how to think for ourselves, how to understand what we know, how to pick a path in a world deluged with opinions and information, and how to look at our society and ourselves with fresh eyes.… (mehr)
Mitglied:amanda4242
Titel:Prisons We Choose to Live Inside
Autoren:Doris Lessing (Autor)
Info:[United States] : Harper Collins Publishers, 2013.
Sammlungen:Read, Gelesen, aber nicht im Besitz
Bewertung:**
Tags:read, non-fiction, essays/lectures/speeches, ANC, 2023

Werk-Informationen

Prisons We Choose to Live Inside von Doris Lessing (1987)

Lädt ...

Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest.

Le prigioni che abbiamo dentro è un breve libriccino che raccoglie cinque mini-saggi trasmessi per via radiofonica da Doris Lessing nel 1985. Come da sottotitolo, si parla di libertà, nello specifico di libertà di pensiero e di quanto sia difficile mantenerla, soprattutto se si sottostà a pressioni di gruppo.

Devo dire che il saggio risente della sua età: immagino che nel 1985 fosse un buon modo per avviare un dibattito sulla difficoltà di mantenere le proprie idee quando il nostro gruppo di appartenenza le disapprova. Tuttavia, oggi di questo tema si è molto parlato e dibattuto, tanto che anche un passante casuale saprà dirvi due parole in merito.

Non mi sento, però, di biasimare Doris Lessing per questo, visto che, nella pratica, si hanno ancora parecchi problemi. Quanto è difficile ancora oggi avere un quadro d'insieme su una certa questione? Cos'è che pare fondamentale sapere a tutt* noi? Da che parte sta quell*?

Prima ancora di sapere i motivi di una scelta, prima ancora di aver analizzato con cura una questione, ci preoccupiamo di sapere se una persona è dalla nostra parte – e dalla parte del nostro “gruppo” – oppure dalla parte altrui, a noi estranea, nemica. Lo facciamo un po' tutt*, è nella natura umana, ma non per questo è una buona pratica (natura non è per niente sinonimo di bene). Come ci suggerisce Doris Lessing, dovremmo educare i/le nostr* bambin* soprattutto a “resistere” alla tentazione dell'influenza del gruppo.

Quindi mi sento di consigliare la lettura di questo piccolo saggio a chi è digiun* di questi argomenti e a chi magari non è abituat* a leggere saggistica e vorrebbe iniziare da qualcosa di non troppo impegnativo. ( )
  lasiepedimore | Sep 19, 2023 |
Great rationale to question personal and social belief systems and the tension between the primitive and social being. ( )
  maitrigita | Dec 30, 2019 |
Nobel Laureate Doris Lessing makes an argument for the importance of individualism in modern society. Her argument that the need for everyone to think critically, to question received knowledge and always be suspicious of peer pressure, unquestioning conformity and internal censorship is as true today as it was in 1986. These were lessons she knows should have been learnt by her own time, but were not and have still not become the norm now. This far I am in agreement and it is all too easy to see examples today. And yet the were several issues that I found very problematic.

It is very much a product of its time and a preoccupation with Cold War politics and communist regimes, while dated, is completely understandable. My issues were with other elements. Lessing's idea that her society was "reverting" to a more brutal state relies on a progressive idea of history that jars while at the same time setting up the idea that a better age existed, a fact white she does ruefully admit. As extreme repressive regimes continue to fall away only to repeat in slightly altered form it is difficult to support the idea that such developments are really a reversion to a previous "primitive" state. The very use of such adjectives now causes a wince.

There are also several references to objective observation during her discussion of the role of literature and the social sciences that assume that this is possible when even the "hard"sciences today suggest that all observation not only suffers from bias but even causes it.

Most significantly of all was a balance between the individual and the group that I don't agree with. Groups do have a tendancy towards mass thought, to ready acceptance of the received view and there is always the danger of the "mob" in action and in thought but while new ideas might originate with brave individuals (Akhenaten is a questionable example and her interpretation of his place in Egyptian history troubled me) it is only with support of a group, however small this may be at the start, that these can have real impact.

Lessing had, of course, seen plenty of horrific examples of the dark side of dogmatic groups, the false patriotism of the First World War, the colonialism of the British Empire, fascist and communist dictatorships from the 1930s onwards and I would in no denigrate her argument with regards to these examples. But one of the results of her personal experience is an overly monolithic and primarily negative view of all mass movements that carries with it it's own problems. Yes, we need to think, we need to question, we need to be aware of ourselves as individuals and we will always need the few who are brave and tireless and unwavering but they in turn will always need the cooperation and support of wider sections of society. ( )
  moray_reads | Mar 20, 2018 |
Prisons We Choose To Live Inside by Doris Lessing 1986
These essays are taken from a series of five lectures given by Doris Lessing under the auspices of the Canadian Broadcasting Company in 1985. The overriding themes of of these lectures are that we do not learn from history, we as a civilization keep repeating the same mistakes, despite being better informed and we fail to take notice of the developing sciences of psychology and anthropology. Lessing makes her case persuasively and asks the questions that continue to baffle some people. Why do we continue to go to war, why do we elect leaders that we know or at least suspect are telling us lies.

“ I think it is sentimental to discuss the subject of war or peace, without acknowledging that a great many people enjoy war - not only the idea of it but the fighting itself……… people who have lived through a war know that as it approaches, an at first secret, unacknowledged, elation begins, as if an almost invisible drum is beating……….an awful, illicit, violent excitement is abroad….. everyone is possessed by it.”

“ We have now reached the stage where a political leader not only uses, skilfully, time-honoured rabble rousing tricks - see Shakespeare's Julius Caesar - but employ experts to make it even more effective. But the antidote is that, in an open society, we may also examine these tricks being used on us. If, that is, we choose to examine them”

My favourite of the five short essays (they are all good) is her one on Group Minds: nothing scientific here and nothing particularly new but she gets across her points as to how difficult it is to stand apart from the majority, whether it is a social group, an income level group, or even a protest movement. How easy it is to be carried along by emotions instead of examining the evidence at hand in the light of reason.

The Wind Blows Away our Words by Doris Lessing 1987
This is reportage and stories following Lessing’s trip to Peshawar and Chitral in Pakistan in 1986. She had for some time been involved in the Resistance to the Russian invasion of Afghanistan through the aid organisation Afghan Relief. Peshawar in Northern Pakistan is as near as many people could get to the front line resistance in Afghanistan and was at that time the home to a huge number of refugees. She got to interview some of the leaders of the Muhjahadin, but her primary focus in this extended essay is the plight of the refugees, particularly the women, who having fled the bombing found themselves imprisoned in camps where their freedom was curtailed by the rising power of the Mullahs

She bemoans the fact that the Russian invasion of Afghanistan and the plight of the refugees received little coverage in the Western press; famine in Africa was much higher in the list of priorities, in spite of the fact that there were an estimated five million Afghan refugees and over a million civilians killed by the Russians.

There is no doubt that Lessing had points to make from her own perspective, but I see them as particularly valid. I had stayed in Peshawar and Chitral ten years earlier and had spent a little time in Afghanistan as well staying in the same hotels that Lessing was reporting from and so her descriptions of the towns and villages brought them back vividly to life. I have no reason to doubt that her descriptions of the border regions on the edge of conflict are no less accurate.

Both of these collections of essays are well worth reading, 4 stars. ( )
  baswood | May 11, 2017 |
A clear-sighted, well-argued plea for individuality of thought in an age of mass emotions and social conditioning.

Doris Lessing has faith in the power of writers to stay detached from these mass emotions and "enable us to see ourselves as others see us." I like the image she gives of writers as a collective organism, constantly evolving but always providing this same crucial function of detached examination of the human condition.

There are some fascinating passages on the way mass emotions are constructed by governments and leaders, for example pointing out how often "blood" is invoked when calling people to war or revolution - this, she says, is a harking back to our long ancestral history of ritual sacrifice, cleansing through blood. Also the constant projection of an Enemy to rally people together.

It's refreshing to hear Lessing's account of how often majority opinion has been completely wrong, and the most seemingly unchangeable opinions have changed completely - for example the white minority in the Rhodesia of her childhood thought that their racist regime would last forever, but it didn't. Also in World War Two, Britons revered friendly, pipe-smoking Uncle Joe Stalin, their ally against Hitler, but then a couple of years later he was their worst enemy (I remember my grandmother talking about this as well).

There are lots of fascinating psychological experiments showing how much we will do to agree with authority or with the group - only a small minority (she puts it at 10%) is usually prepared to go against the group opinion, often at great individual cost. She says that all of us are, to some degree, brainwashed by the society we live in, and that "There is nothing much we can do about this except to remember that it is so."

She goes on: "It seems to me that we are being governed by waves of mass emotion, and while they last it is not possible to ask cool, serious questions. One simply has to shut up and wait, everything passes." This reminds me of living in New York through 9/11 and the hugely irrational responses to it. In that time, there were certain things you simply couldn't say.

Lessing gives several examples of this group thinking, from classic psychological experiments (such as the one where people are divided into prisoners and warders, and the warders quickly become sadistic and authoritarian) to the world of literature, where certain writers are praised by everyone, then suddenly fall out of fashion (Lessing herself wrote a couple of novels under a pseudonym to see if they got the same reaction as her other work, and of course they were rejected by her two regular publishers and ignored by the critics).

This book was written in 1987, before the arrival of technologies like the internet. The methods of control and manipulation are surely stronger now than in 1987, but so are the possibilities for resistance. It's easier now to find the information that undercuts official propaganda, or to publish your own individual views, or to connect with other people who dissent from the majority opinion. Not following the herd is a challenge at any time, but, as Lessing says, it's vital:

"Of course, there are original minds, people who do take their own line, who do not fall victim to the need to say, or do, what everyone else does. But they are few. Very few. On them depends the health, the vitality of all our institutions." ( )
  AndrewBlackman | Jan 11, 2009 |
keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen

Gehört zu Verlagsreihen

Du musst dich einloggen, um "Wissenswertes" zu bearbeiten.
Weitere Hilfe gibt es auf der "Wissenswertes"-Hilfe-Seite.
Gebräuchlichster Titel
Die Informationen sind von der italienischen Wissenswertes-Seite. Ändern, um den Eintrag der eigenen Sprache anzupassen.
Originaltitel
Alternative Titel
Ursprüngliches Erscheinungsdatum
Figuren/Charaktere
Wichtige Schauplätze
Wichtige Ereignisse
Zugehörige Filme
Epigraph (Motto/Zitat)
Widmung
Erste Worte
Zitate
Letzte Worte
Hinweis zur Identitätsklärung
Verlagslektoren
Werbezitate von
Originalsprache
Anerkannter DDC/MDS
Anerkannter LCC

Literaturhinweise zu diesem Werk aus externen Quellen.

Wikipedia auf Englisch (1)

"One of the most important writers of the past hundred years." --The Times (London) In this perceptive collection of essays, Doris Lessing addresses directly the prime questions before us all: how to think for ourselves, how to understand what we know, how to pick a path in a world deluged with opinions and information, and how to look at our society and ourselves with fresh eyes.

Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden.

Buchbeschreibung
Zusammenfassung in Haiku-Form

Aktuelle Diskussionen

Keine

Beliebte Umschlagbilder

Gespeicherte Links

Bewertung

Durchschnitt: (3.61)
0.5 2
1
1.5
2 6
2.5
3 15
3.5 2
4 15
4.5
5 14

Bist das du?

Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor.

 

Über uns | Kontakt/Impressum | LibraryThing.com | Datenschutz/Nutzungsbedingungen | Hilfe/FAQs | Blog | LT-Shop | APIs | TinyCat | Nachlassbibliotheken | Vorab-Rezensenten | Wissenswertes | 203,243,233 Bücher! | Menüleiste: Immer sichtbar