Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... Angels: A Very Short Introduction (2011. Auflage)von David Albert Jones
Werk-InformationenAngels: A Very Short Introduction von David Albert Jones
Keine Lädt ...
Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest. Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
Gehört zur Reihe
What are angels? Where were they first encountered? Can we distinguish angels from gods, fairies, ghosts, and aliens? And why do they remain so popular? This book investigates stories and speculations about angels in religions old and new, in art literature, film, and the popular imagination. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeineBeliebte Umschlagbilder
Google Books — Lädt ... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)202.15Religions Religion Doctrines Objects of worship and veneration Good spiritsKlassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
i) late ancient or medieval texts by Pseudo-Dionysus or Aquinas.
ii) contemporary accounts of how angels will stop you getting in car accidents.
Now, wouldn't it be nice if there was something in between? Something that didn't treat you like an idiot, but recognized that you are not a theologian or intellectual historian?
Jones tries to fill that unnecessary gap, and more or less fails. I have no doubt he's a respectable scholar, but he seems to be the kind of respectable scholar who believes that writing for the general public means writing like a freshman who's had three composition seminars:
"In 586 BCE the King of Judah was defeated in battle and Jerusalem was captured by the Babylonians. Many of the people were taken into exile in Babylon. This had a great effect on their religious beliefs, including their beliefs about angels. This was recognized by the Jews themselves."
Note the vagueness (*what* effect?), the unwillingness to follow out a train of thought (*how* did it have an effect?), the 'redrafting' that consists entirely of cutting run-on sentences into multiple sentences, but never rises to the challenge of (gasp!) 'which' clauses.
This wouldn't matter if Jones said anything interesting or informative about angels; you'll only learn something from this book if you've never seen any art, never read any of the old testament, nor quran etc. If you know literally nothing, I admit, this is the book for you, because Jones will tell you important contextual things, for instance, Paul Klee was friends with Kandinsky (p 24; I have no idea why he tells us this), or Revelations is the last book in the new testament.
Enough, before I talk myself into a one star rating. ( )