Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
|
Lädt ... Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Controlvon Medea Benjamin
   Keine Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch.  Zare | Jan 23, 2024 |  keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
Weeks after the 2002 American invasion of Afghanistan, Medea Benjamin visited that country. There, on the ground, talking with victims of the strikes, she learned the reality behind the "precision bombs" on which US forces were becoming increasingly reliant. Now, with the use of drones escalating at a meteoric pace, Benjamin has written this book as a call to action: "It is meant to wake a sleeping public lulled into thinking that drones are good, that targeted killings are making us safer." Drone Warfare is a comprehensive look at the growing menace of robotic warfare, with an extensive analysis of who is producing the drones, where they are being used, who "pilots" these unmanned planes, who the victims are, and what the legal and moral implications are. In a vivid, accessible style, the book also looks at what activists, lawyers, and scientists are doing to ground the drones and considers ways to move forward. In reality, writes Benjamin, the assassinations we are carrying out via drones will come back to haunt us when others start doing the same thing-to us. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeineBeliebte Umschlagbilder
 Google Books — Lädt ...GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)623.7469Technology Engineering and allied operations Military Engineering and Marine Engineering Military Aviation; Military Wheeled & Tracked Vehicles; Related Technologies Military Aviation; Military Wheeled & Tracked Vehicles Military Aviation Drones/UAVsKlassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt: (3.67)
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1
War is not meant to be bloodless, distant and perceived as a video-game. We live in a society that embraces desocialization as a way living - but basically this is nothing more than excuse to embrace total personal isolation as a way of life (much easier when you do not have to think about others but only of yourself) and removal of family [as a basic social unit] from everyday life. Whoever thinks that alienating from others is a way to go is terribly wrong. When society is split apart that society is not able to do anything at all.
So is it strange that dehumanization is now starting to find it's way in the activity so closely related to human society? Horrors of war are there for a reason - they are part of it. Without it war is becoming common thing, something that you hear on the news and skip it so you could move on with your favorite TV show. Be concerned when you do not even blink after hearing news of some war atrocity taking place somewhere in the world. Without the risk of loss of life, of destruction, without fear, war becomes an industry, something that people will find acceptable because, hey, it does not happen here but someplace over the seas and who cares about that - right?
War is an exception in politics, disregard the hawks who say that there is always some conflict around the corner. it is true but war is an exception, end to a means - it is not supposed to be a means to itself. Using war to start and run industries and create work-places is perversion by definition - does this mean that in order to have everything running in order war must be made persistent? War for the war's sake is a path to total obliteration of society and rise of all those social elements as described in very books of Orwell and Huxley. Are the people ready to go this way is up to them but one thing remains true - they cannot say they were ignorant of the facts. (