Flawed, but interesting biography of a flawed, but interesting man. ( )

This is, in my opinion, quite a balanced portrait of Collins by Coogan. He is clearly a fan of his muse but does try to present his thesis with a critical eye. The book is well written and argued and flows well. Collins is seen as a simple soldier dealing with nefarious politicians out to stab him in the back. But this image is far from the reality. This book is far superior to his next work on de Valera where Coogan lets his bias, some would say bordering on the extreme, get the better of him far too often. ( )

3742. Michael Collins: The Man Who Made Ireland, by Tim Pat Coogan (read 8 May 2003) This biography of a leading figure in modern Irish history who was born 12 Oct 1890 and shot to death in a firefight near Cork on 22 Aug 1922 looks with favor on Collins though is not uncritical. Much of the account is of much interest, but Coogan has a non-felicitous style and some of the book was of less interest--the account of atrocities by both sides did not entrance. And Coogan assumes a greater familiarity with events from 1916 to 1922 than I have, though I have read much about those amazing years in Ireland. ( )

Michael Collins was an extraordinary man, the inventor, it is said, of modern urban guerilla warfare; the man who led the war to end 700 years of British occupation of Ireland. Here was a man that was not a cog in in some vast socio-economic machine, whose only desire is "to just get along." He was one of those who didn't experience the benefits of the coexistence of two cultures in one land, because one of them was politically and economically savaging the other.

He did not have as his primary goal in life to accumulate the accouterments of a materialistic civilization for himself, nor did he ever have a mortgage to pay. He never owned a car. He never formed a family. He never knew such idiots who populate the safety committees of the industrial organizations in our own time, nor the phonies who infest our academies, longing for tenure. He loved his culture, as it was, and resented outsiders who had only scorn for it.

He was a leader of men, a man of action, a stickler for detail, who always knew what he wanted to accomplish. His physical courage was unimaginable to most men, even to those of his own time and place. His outstanding political skills and ability to do what was required to achieve the achievable was unmatched by any of the politicos and hotheads who surrounded him.

His primary task in the rebellion was in counter-intelligence, which he came to see required the assassination of informants and torturers, detectives and G-men, and the higher-ups of the British intelligence services who directed it all and placed a price on his head. This culminated in a "Bloody Sunday" in which his men attacked the "Cairo Gang" in their lodgings, some still in their beds, killing 19 of them. The Brits retaliated with a massacre of unarmed spectators at a football match, but ultimately it resulted in the opening of negotiations. Incredibly, Collins was chosen to lead the negotiating team, and wound up across the table from Lloyd George, Austen Chamberlin, and Winston Churchill. He brought home an agreement for the Free State.

Coogan tells his tale very thoroughly, at length, and with a satisfying balance of an attention to fact, considered speculation, and telling anecdote. He is an accomplished historian who knows his subject intimately. The author has written on the order of a dozen books on the modern history of Ireland, and is widely recognized for his authority, but not necessarily for an "objectivity" that belies the need for drawing lessons that should be the goal of any historian.

The book is at times, perhaps, a little too detailed for the general reader, but it is something of a "definitive biography", so I can forgive him for this. It is over 500 pages long with a very good bibliography, footnotes, and a terrific index. The 17 pictures are glossy and clear and add a lot to the story.

One of the most rewarding of things about reading this book is that it led me, I think, to a greater understanding of the events in Iraq, also suffering under an occupation by a hostile power, being fought by patriots and coreligionists in an urban setting, whose enemies from another land and religion label them terrorists and murderers. ( )