Web-Site durchsuchen
Diese Seite verwendet Cookies für unsere Dienste, zur Verbesserung unserer Leistungen, für Analytik und (falls Sie nicht eingeloggt sind) für Werbung. Indem Sie LibraryThing nutzen, erklären Sie dass Sie unsere Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie gelesen und verstanden haben. Die Nutzung unserer Webseite und Dienste unterliegt diesen Richtlinien und Geschäftsbedingungen.
Hide this

Ergebnisse von Google Books

Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.

Conflict Is Not Abuse: Overstating Harm,…
Lädt ...

Conflict Is Not Abuse: Overstating Harm, Community Responsibility, and the… (2016. Auflage)

von Sarah Schulman (Autor)

MitgliederRezensionenBeliebtheitDurchschnittliche BewertungDiskussionen
239488,461 (4)Keine
From intimate relationships to global politics, Sarah Schulman observes a continuum: that inflated accusations of harm are used to avoid accountability. Illuminating the difference between Conflict and Abuse, Schulman directly addresses our contemporary culture of scapegoating. This deep, brave, and bold work reveals how punishment replaces personal and collective self-criticism, and shows why difference is so often used to justify cruelty and shunning.… (mehr)
Titel:Conflict Is Not Abuse: Overstating Harm, Community Responsibility, and the Duty of Repair
Autoren:Sarah Schulman (Autor)
Info:Arsenal Pulp Press (2016), 288 pages
Sammlungen:Gelesen, aber nicht im Besitz
Tags:nonfiction, conflict, violence, abuse, lgbtq, politics, palestine, israel, audiobook, relationships


Conflict Is Not Abuse: Overstating Harm, Community Responsibility, and the Duty of Repair von Sarah Schulman

Lädt ...

Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest.

Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch.

Addresses an important issue, and well-written in parts, but the central thesis is rather undermined by the author's unwillingness to take accountability for her own mistakes, or even accept that she may be wrong sometimes. ( )
  Clare_L | Sep 20, 2021 |
There's some real insight here, but I think this book would have been better as a single focused essay. Instead the author has added a lot of anecdata which I'm not sure holds up to scrutiny, a thesis-less critique of the queer reclamation of family as a thing we get to have, and an extended piece on the 2014 Gaza war that is mostly other people's social media posts (and no evidence that permission was given for publication of those posts). ( )
  elenaj | Jul 31, 2020 |
Made me think, don't agree with all of it. "Snowflakes." Liberal college campuses are denying speakers freedom of speech. Oh, don't like what I said? Do you need a safe space? Are you triggered? Are you upset over the election?
While this book is not specifically about any of the above, I definitely thought of some of the ongoing discussions/arguments (depending on how you put it) and the conflicts that arise. Author Schulman takes the reader on why and how things like texting and emails are harmful for communication, the difference between conflict and abuse (and how to resolve them), how this dynamic can manifest on both the personal level and within the public sphere, and so forth. 
I was not familiar with her background prior to reading this book but despite some of the mixed reviews I thought this would be an interesting book that would be good reading. And it was, but I'm not sure how helpful this can be since I couldn't help but feel the author is writing very much from her own personal experiences (which in itself is not terrible but not always applicable to other people) and may not fully realize some of the complex issues that go on in many of the situations she writes about.
For example, I honestly wondered if she's had bad experiences with the silent treatment or ghosting. She blames the person who refuses to talk for "withholding" and that it's detrimental to everyone involved. Or she talks about an example of receiving an email cancellation for a lunch date and says "Email creates repression and anxiety" (pg 45). She honestly reminded me of anecdotes that I've heard where the romantic relationship ended yet one partner insists on "hashing it out" or "working through our issues" or whatever but it becomes a long, dragged out process where's clear that partner just doesn't want to let go and often doesn't accept it until the other party deliberately puts up barriers (cutting off all contact, blocking on social media, sending a third party to communicate to leave them alone, etc.).
Or, in another example in the introduction, she talks about how her high school guidance counselor warned her not to tell her parents about her sexual orientation due to their homophobia. She writes that by doing so "he upheld the distorted thinking, unjustified punishment, and exclusion." Schulman continues to write that if she is in a similar situation now with her students, she offers to speak to the parents, to provide alternatives, "to intervene and stand up to brutality in order to protect its recipient and transform their context" (pg 27). 
I honestly found that quite misguided. She made it about her and what she would do but what about the students? What is their background, could they be in danger if they were outed to their parents/peers/community, do they have resources, do they WANT to come out? I do not share her experiences but this made me incredibly uncomfortable. Certainly there are many situations where having someone like a professor speak on your behalf can be quite helpful but I was puzzled by the lack discussion on the possible dangers too. 
That said, I think there is merit to the book. I can agree that sometimes there is a reaction for too quick of a judgment in situations that really could be resolved by an honest conversation where both parties do want to resolve the situation before it escalates. Email and texting are handy as forms of communication but sometimes there is an essence lost when communicating that way. 
But in the end, I feel the author thinks there should be a greater level of engagement and assumes too much: that both parties want to resolve the situation amiably, that there is an equal dynamic (the want for communication *can* become abusive by demanding someone's time, emotional labor, maybe even money if it requires travel or phone minutes, etc.). On a personal level I can respect that and have encountered people who feel the same way that Schulman does: more communication, that people should be willing to educate, etc. But I do thinks she projects a little too much of her own personal preferences and feels entitled to something that not everyone wants to give.
People also liked her chapter on HIV and the chapter on Israel and Palestine but honestly I can't help but be a bit jaded as to how much of her own personal biases may have played a part after the initial chapters. They were also not topics that interested me (and quite frankly felt out of place--sometimes the author really didn't do a great job in switching/transitional between the personal and the not so much). At times it also felt like the author put down a lot of words but didn't actually SAY anything substantive.
Again, it made me think and I would be interested in reading more but at the same time it felt like the author is in a bit of a bubble. I'd borrow it from the library or get it as a bargain book.
  ( )
  HoldMyBook | Feb 11, 2018 |
Sarah Schulman’s Conflict is not Abuse is the best book I have read this year, bar none. Even when I disagreed Sarah always made me think, question my own beliefs and tease out how my own patterns of managing conflict impacted others, especially in individual conflict and in the many political groups I have been a member.
Basically Sarah says that conflict and abuse are conflated which can lead to a victimization mindset, ruin relationships and break up political and community groups. Sarah also notes that global conflicts have the same roots as interpersonal and group struggles. Projection and denial and differing values based in race, class, gender and personality are the sources of conflict and that to heal there must be an understanding of these sources and the dynamic it has created. I agree with Sarah about projection and denial in interpersonal and group dynamics but am not convinced that projection and denial is the most salient cause of global conflict. This is when Sarah's concepts become unhelpful generalizations. Yes, it plays a part but it is not sufficient.
I also disagreed with Sarah that survivors of sexual abuse and domestic violence are main disruptors of individual relationships and political groups. It is a double edge sword to place blame on the blameless and add to the pigeon holding of survivors. It's hurtful and maddening to survivors to be seen as a malignant force. This may be true that this dynamic can occur and it makes sense that survivors would have distortions of thinking and may act out but this is stereotypical and harmful. Sometimes because of abuse survivors have the ability to cut right through the drama and dynamic right in front of them and call it out. Seeing bullshit all their lives make them exquisitely perceptive and they know how to create boundaries and when and whom it makes sense to talk to. It is hard to know whether this is Sarah's projections, based in her own experience or not.
I also believe that cut-offs are especially problematic and hard. It is really heartbreaking to have a friend walk away without warning and block communication. It had happened to me and is so painful. I have never walked away from somebody but I have fought with somebody and disengaged from them even when they wanted to try to mend the relationship. I can’t say there was really any reason except fear. It is hard for me to decide whether to try to engage again and if/when trying to do so is productive. In any case, Conflict is not Abuse, is a beautiful and profound book that will keep with asking questions and remaining woke to the issues and that is a wonderful gift. ( )
  Karen59 | Feb 6, 2018 |
keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
Du musst dich einloggen, um "Wissenswertes" zu bearbeiten.
Weitere Hilfe gibt es auf der "Wissenswertes"-Hilfe-Seite.
Gebräuchlichster Titel
Alternative Titel
Ursprüngliches Erscheinungsdatum
Wichtige Schauplätze
Wichtige Ereignisse
Zugehörige Filme
Preise und Auszeichnungen
Die Informationen stammen von der englischen "Wissenswertes"-Seite. Ändern, um den Eintrag der eigenen Sprache anzupassen.
Epigraph (Motto/Zitat)
Erste Worte
Letzte Worte
Hinweis zur Identitätsklärung
Werbezitate von
Anerkannter DDC/MDS
Anerkannter LCC

Literaturhinweise zu diesem Werk aus externen Quellen.

Wikipedia auf Englisch


From intimate relationships to global politics, Sarah Schulman observes a continuum: that inflated accusations of harm are used to avoid accountability. Illuminating the difference between Conflict and Abuse, Schulman directly addresses our contemporary culture of scapegoating. This deep, brave, and bold work reveals how punishment replaces personal and collective self-criticism, and shows why difference is so often used to justify cruelty and shunning.

Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden.

Zusammenfassung in Haiku-Form

Beliebte Umschlagbilder

Gespeicherte Links


Durchschnitt: (4)
2 2
3 4
4 6
5 8

Bist das du?

Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor.


Über uns | Kontakt/Impressum | | Datenschutz/Nutzungsbedingungen | Hilfe/FAQs | Blog | LT-Shop | APIs | TinyCat | Nachlassbibliotheken | Vorab-Rezensenten | Wissenswertes | 163,446,200 Bücher! | Menüleiste: Immer sichtbar