There are plenty of things that I did not like about Boyd's The Blue Afternoon, but the excellent telling of a story is not one of them. The limpid style and the sometimes unexpected note of hitting the human condition right between the eyes adds to an intriguing tale. Published in 1993 this is Boyd's sixth novel to hit the bookstores and he had by this time already established himself as a best selling novelist.

The novel is divided in three unequal parts. The middle section is by far the longest and tells the story of Doctor Carriscant, it is set in Manila in 1902 and although Carriscant is telling the story of his life in the Philippines it is told in the third person. Carriscant was a surgeon in a large hospital and his new ideas of scrupulous cleanliness and his operating skills and teamwork had resulted in a huge success rate in comparison with the old style surgeon Dr Cruz who was still wallowing in filth. There is a guerrilla war against American forces taking place in the countryside, but this has little impact on life in Manilla. Doctor Carriscant falls in love with Delphine who is married to an American Officer, they conduct a difficult affair amidst the spying servants and the close knit community. Carriscant has other problems a series of gruesome murders of American serviceman leads Paton Bobby as the investigating officer to Carriscant's door first to help with the medical details, but then as a suspect. Carriscant's anaesthetist Pantaleon after learning of Carriscant's affair blackmails him into co-piloting an attempt on the heavier than air (motorised) flight distance record.

The first section is told in the first person by Kay Fischer making a living as an architect in Los Angeles in 1936. Carriscant contacts her claiming that she is his daughter. Kay has no reason to believe him and her mother who is still alive stays by her story that a certain Englishman Hugh Paget was her father, but he died two months after she was born. Kay however gets drawn into Carriscant's claim and agrees to help him in a search for Paton Bobby who has retired to LA. They find Bobby and this is when Carriscant tells her his story. This first section is told as a pastiche of a Raymond Chandler mystery thriller with Kay acting out the role of a hard headed business woman. The final part is of course the search for Delphine who Carriscant believes is still alive and living in Lisbon and we are back with Kays first person story, but the pastiche is missing. This leads to one of the problems I found with the novel it does not quite hang together. Boyd has created a mystery and a style of telling the story only to abandon it when Cariiscant's story is told. There are also plenty of gaps in Carriscants tale that are never resolved, maybe because he is an unreliable narrator or because Boyd does not want to provide the reader with all the answers, but some of the answers would have been good.

The story of the love affair and the clandestine relationship is the best and most intriguing part of the book. The murder story is gruesome as is the descriptions of the operations and Dr Cruz is shown as a monster, Boyd likes to rub his readers noses in the filth and the dirt, and this can spill over into his telling of acts of physical love, where he strives to convey an erotism that made this reader feel a bit like a voyeur.

As a spinner of tales Boyd is right on the money, but at the end of the day I did not believe any of it, despite some flashing insights in human psychology that the author suddenly seems to pluck out of the ether and that do ring true. This novel is good entertainment with Boyd's skill at setting his characters in a time and place and providing enough of a sketch to fill in some of the background. A beach read, but one that may leave the reader a little frustrated. 3.5 stars.

This was the next unread book on my shelves, which I must have bought in a charity shop. The books price had been reduced from £3.50 to 50p and inside was a newspaper clipping giving a good review of the book. I presume this was an enterprising bookseller but it could have been a reader who wanted to remind him/herself of the book. ( )

What to do when a stranger starts haunting you and claiming to be your real father? Just up and go galavanting off to Europe perhaps? As a devoted Boyd fan, I have to say that this one is just not up to par. Its second part, the major story-within-a-story part, rather resembles a tawdry soap opera. And, after all the backstory you'd think all the mystery's loose ends might get tied up in the end, but [sadly] they are not. Okay, but a bit disappointing overall - this one is for the Boyd completists. ( )

Unusual story told in three parts - first in Los Angeles, second, the largest part in Manila, and finally in Lisbon. A murder mystery and a love story. One of the main characters, Kay Fisher, is an architect and the story spends quite a bit of time trying to educate me on how and why this architect does what she does. This should have been interesting but that part of the story didn't interest me at all. What did interest me was the mystery surrounding an old man who appears and claims to be her father.

The characters here weren't likable for the most part and it was hard to be sympathetic. The reader as well as Kay keeps wondering if the old man is scamming her. He seems sincere but he is also extremely obtuse and not forthcoming with information. He seems to sucker Kay in by the somewhat devious way he has of getting her to do things. She gets surprised.

The central heart of the story is the middle where we move back in time to hear the old man's story. And he is the one telling it. The beginning of the book had me as a detached observer but once we went back to the Philippines in 1902 I was really pulled in. It represents 2/3 of the book and was really excellent historical fiction around events and a time and place that I was quite intrigued with and knew little about. At the end of the novel I was a little frustrated because we really don't know the truth of what happened and even though we the reader and Kay the daughter have been told a story it doesn't quite fit all the puzzle pieces together properly. I suspect some truths were not revealed and am still unsure of this all, and I suspect that was the author's intention. This gets a few points for atmosphere in 1936 Los Angeles and especially 1902 Manila. There is some interesting history written in here with the story about the American occupation of the Philippines. The descriptions of vivisection and surgical techniques and bodies really gets a little gruesome. Not for the faint of heart.

This was pretty good, but I thought the first part of the story was quite weak and unbelievable. It keeps me from rating this higher. The characters all have very unusual names - I don't know if this is a William Boyd thing or just particular to this book. ( )

I looked forward to reading another William Boyd book and straight off I have to say that this one was not one of his best but hey, don't let that stop you reading it because 'not one of his best' is much, much better than many another author. As usual the names are slightly odd but you soon get used to them. Salvador is an odd character I was never quite sure who he truly was and what he really did or did not do and when I got to the end although everything was laid out and covered and tied up I was still left wondering who was bluffing whom. Not a bad read all the same ( )

When the story proper begins, it is totally engrossing. Dr Salvador Carriscant goes from eminent surgeon in the Philippines to cook in a story or murder, infatuation and intrigue. Great read. ( )