Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... I Like to Watch: Arguing My Way Through the TV Revolution (Original 2020; 2019. Auflage)von Emily Nussbaum (Autor)
Werk-InformationenI Like to Watch: Arguing My Way Through the TV Revolution von Emily Nussbaum (2020)
Keine Lädt ...
Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest. Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. I like to watch, and I apparently like to read about watching. Television, of course. I wrote a list of every tv show in the book and now I never need to leave my apartment again, or turn off my tv again, which is every girl's dream! Television is now my spouse and I'm throwing a bridal shower where every item on my registry is a subscription to a different streaming service. I spotted this in one of those free libraries you see on the street that's usually filled with dusty paperbacks. I recognized the cover from twitter and grabbed it immediately. Like TV, I Like to Watch is self referential jumping forwards and backwards from a Sopranos piece from 2007 to a sprawling profile of Ryan Murphy from 2018. Connections bubble to the surface. A conflicted love letter to Joan Rivers sets up a pan of The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel . Nussbaum drops in before each essay to muse on them like a director on a DVD commentary track. Sometimes to reflect on the writing process or sometimes just to say, "One of the SUR ensemble tweeted a winky-face emoji to me after this piece came out." A healthy mix of pans, raves, think pieces and profiles, I Like to Watch is the perfect guide to the last 40 years of television. keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
AuszeichnungenPrestigeträchtige AuswahlenBemerkenswerte Listen
"From her creation of the first 'Approval Matrix' in New York magazine in 2004 to her Pulitzer Prize-winning columns for The New Yorker, Emily Nussbaum has known all along that what we watch is who we are. In this collection, including several substantive, never-before-published essays, Nussbaum writes about her passion for television beginning with Buffy--as she writes, a show that was so much more than its critical assessment--the evolution of female protagonists over the last decade, the complex role of sexual violence on TV, and what to do about art when the artist is revealed to be a monster. And, she also explores the links between the television antihero and the rise of Trump. The book is an argument, not a collection of reviews. Through it all, Nussbaum recounts her fervent search, over fifteen years, for a new kind of criticism that resists the false hierarchy that places one kind of culture over another. It traces her own development as she has struggled to punch through stifling notions of 'prestige television,' searching for a wilder and freer and more varied idea of artistic ambition--one that acknowledges many types of beauty and complexity, and that opens to more varied voices. It's a book that celebrates television as television, even as each year warps the definition of just what that might mean"-- Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeineBeliebte Umschlagbilder
Google Books — Lädt ... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)791.45The arts Recreational and performing arts Public performances Film, Radio, and Television TelevisionKlassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
They're fairly varied. Some are short commentaries on individual shows, others use specific shows to make larger points, and some are rather broader, like an essay on the subject of product placement in TV. There are also some profiles of particular showrunners.
Nussbaum writes with a distinctly feminist sensibility, although it is a variety particularly her own, as someone who enjoys edgy, raunchy humor and sees a valid place for stories about sexual assault and violence against women on TV, but who also has very strong feelings about the way television, and especially the shows that get labeled as "prestige television," so overwhelmingly center the straight white male perspective both in front of and behind the cameras, and about the ways in which stories more squarely aimed at women tend to be treated dismissively.
She's a good, interesting writer making some good, interesting points, and, somewhat to my surprise, I found that even when she was talking about shows I'd never seen -- which was probably at least half of them -- she almost always still easily kept my attention. And, really, I'd say this entire collection might be worth it just for the long, thoughtful essay she wrote in the wake of #metoo, grappling in a deeply honest way with the impossible question of how much it's possible to separate art from artist and what we can or ought to do with good art by terrible people. ( )