StartseiteGruppenForumMehrZeitgeist
Web-Site durchsuchen
Diese Seite verwendet Cookies für unsere Dienste, zur Verbesserung unserer Leistungen, für Analytik und (falls Sie nicht eingeloggt sind) für Werbung. Indem Sie LibraryThing nutzen, erklären Sie dass Sie unsere Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie gelesen und verstanden haben. Die Nutzung unserer Webseite und Dienste unterliegt diesen Richtlinien und Geschäftsbedingungen.

Ergebnisse von Google Books

Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.

Lädt ...

Who's to Say?: A Dialogue on Relativism

von Norman Melchert

MitgliederRezensionenBeliebtheitDurchschnittliche BewertungDiskussionen
781342,875 (2.8)1
Arguments are examined, reexamined, challenged, and honed in this lively dialogue on relativism and objectivity. Topics considered include whether truth and goodness are matters determined by individual opinion; whether they are defined by cultures; whether a non-dogmatic form of relativism is viable; whether the objectivity of science escapes relativism; and pragmatism as an alternative to relativism. Designed to present beginning students with an introduction to the main arguments concerning relativism, this provocative dialogue also serves as a model for thinking clearly about philosophical issues.… (mehr)
Keine
Lädt ...

Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest.

Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch.

» Siehe auch 1 Erwähnung

This is a short primer about relativism, both epistemic and moral. It is an excellent and accessible overview of the various arguments for and against objectivism, realism, individualistic relativism, cultural relativism, and extreme postmodern relativism. It doesn't go into great depth into any of them, which is why I gave it four stars instead of five. But it presents the positions well in a dialog format. (The scenario is a conversation between six old college friends.)

Here are some quotes from the end of this short (84 pages) book:


"Think about the line, 'custom is king over all.' Taken one way it just says human beings live very diverse lives and believe very different things. And that is certainly true, but neither very exciting nor profound.

"But that sense slides into others which amount to a kind of counsel of despair. So we find ourselves saying that there's no telling what's really good or true. That maybe the notions of 'absolutely good' or 'objectively true' don't even make sense—that all we have are opinions anyway. So who's to say? Maybe one opinion is as good as another. It all comes down to personal preference in the end anyway. And in the end we are left with that miserable concept 'true-for-me.'

"But think how it originates. I hear it from my students when they are being pressed hard in argument. they try to escape this way and that, but nothing works. And finally they take refuge in 'Well, anyway, it's true for me!'

"I don't want to be too hard on them; they are still young. But they could admin defeat—say they were mistaken and have now learned something. Or they could say, 'I don't see how to answer that right now; let me think about it and I'll get back to you.' Or they could just admit their ignorance. But 'true-for-me' is the perfect defensive maneuver. It allows us to keep whatever belief we are fond of in a completely secure way. How could anyone show me that something I believe sincerely isn't true for me? Climbing back into that hole, I am completely safe.

"Besides, there is something dishonest about the phrase. It's kind of a cowardly move. To venture out in public with what you think is true takes courage. You expose yourself. Not just your beliefs, but yourself, since you are the one who has accepted these beliefs. And that's scary.

"But Socrates said we shouldn't be afraid to do that; we shouldn't be afraid to be shown wrong. He even said it is a great benefit to us if someone shows us we are mistaken, since having false opinions is an evil we should wish to be without."

"Questions about the good life are not ones we can shrug off. They do get answered one way or another. And if we don't do our best to answer them well, the lazy, the wicked, and the self-interested will answer them for us."

( )
  FluidMindOrg | Jun 14, 2016 |
keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
Du musst dich einloggen, um "Wissenswertes" zu bearbeiten.
Weitere Hilfe gibt es auf der "Wissenswertes"-Hilfe-Seite.
Gebräuchlichster Titel
Originaltitel
Alternative Titel
Ursprüngliches Erscheinungsdatum
Figuren/Charaktere
Wichtige Schauplätze
Wichtige Ereignisse
Zugehörige Filme
Epigraph (Motto/Zitat)
Widmung
Erste Worte
Zitate
Letzte Worte
Hinweis zur Identitätsklärung
Verlagslektoren
Werbezitate von
Originalsprache
Anerkannter DDC/MDS
Anerkannter LCC

Literaturhinweise zu diesem Werk aus externen Quellen.

Wikipedia auf Englisch (1)

Arguments are examined, reexamined, challenged, and honed in this lively dialogue on relativism and objectivity. Topics considered include whether truth and goodness are matters determined by individual opinion; whether they are defined by cultures; whether a non-dogmatic form of relativism is viable; whether the objectivity of science escapes relativism; and pragmatism as an alternative to relativism. Designed to present beginning students with an introduction to the main arguments concerning relativism, this provocative dialogue also serves as a model for thinking clearly about philosophical issues.

Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden.

Buchbeschreibung
Zusammenfassung in Haiku-Form

Aktuelle Diskussionen

Keine

Beliebte Umschlagbilder

Gespeicherte Links

Bewertung

Durchschnitt: (2.8)
0.5 1
1 1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4 2
4.5 1
5

Bist das du?

Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor.

 

Über uns | Kontakt/Impressum | LibraryThing.com | Datenschutz/Nutzungsbedingungen | Hilfe/FAQs | Blog | LT-Shop | APIs | TinyCat | Nachlassbibliotheken | Vorab-Rezensenten | Wissenswertes | 204,791,368 Bücher! | Menüleiste: Immer sichtbar