Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... Kant's Introduction to logic and his Essay on the mistaken subtilty of the four figuresvon Immanuel Kant
Keine Lädt ...
Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest. Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
Gehört zu Verlagsreihen
Kant's Logic (1800) is just a compendium of ordinary scholastic logic, clearly designed for teaching purposes, and of no great philosophical interest. His Introduction, however, gives us - in non-technical language - his views on a number of issues in epistemology: analytic and synthetic judgments, intuitions and concepts, truth and falsity, knowledge and probability. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeine
Google Books — Lädt ... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)160Philosophy and Psychology Logic LogicKlassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt: Keine Bewertungen.Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
Kant begins "Everything in nature, whether in the animate or inanimate world, take place according to rules, although we do not always know the rules." He defines Logic as a science of the right use of reason according how the understanding empirically thinks and ought to think. [6] He divides Logic into its Analytic and Dialectic forms, showing how they are "applied". Then he presents an essay on philosophy and philosophizing, and the problems of this "science" [12] and launches into a "short sketch" of a history of philosophy.
The sketch does not directly pertain to Logic. He credits the Greeks with the first and finest cultivation of rational knowledge, beginning with Thales, the Ionic mathematician [18].
Completing a review of the Eleatic and Pythagorean schools, Kant introduces Socrates and his disciples. Curiously, when he gets to the Romans -- "There were no natural philosophers among the Romans except Pliny the Elder" [22]--he omits Lucretius.
The Notes by Coleridge -- "This appears to be obscurely stated." [98]