Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... Readings in the Classical Historians (Original 1992; 1993. Auflage)von Michael Grant (Herausgeber)
Werk-InformationenReadings in the Classical Historians von Michael Grant (Editor) (1992)
Keine Lädt ...
Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest. Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. If you're not a fan of Michael Grant, don't sweat it. This is an omnibus of ancient historians, judiciously excerpted. The best way to approach this book is to read from it not continuously but from selection to selection, over time. Years really. Every so often you will come across something that makes you want to consume the entire source material, and that's what this is: a tableau of teasers. You nibble something nice, then go off to expose yourself (metaphorically) to the great historians, even the unjustly obscure ones. Oh and it's "Annals", not Anals of Imperial Rome. Or so they claim... Selections from Greek and Roman historians from c. 500 BC to c. 500 AD. Interesting because besides the standard authors (Herodotus, Thucydides, Caesar, Livy, Tacitus etc.) it includes lesser figures like Hecateus, and Velleius Paterculus. Also includes a few religious sources --Josephus, Luke, Eusebius. In this collection of ancient historians writing in Greek and Latin, Grant selects all the historians anyone who casually exposed to Ancient Greek or Roman history would be likely to have heard of: Livy, Thucydides, Plutarch, Polybius, Herodotus, Caesar, Xenophon, Suetonius, Tacitus, and Josephus (translations of his Greek writing). To those he adds a more obscure roster: Hecataeus, Hellanicus, Nepos, Diodorus Siculus, Sallust, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Velleius Paterculus, Appian, Arrian, Dio Cassius, Eusebius, and Ammianus Marcellinus. Luke of the Gospels is also thrown in for his historical material. There are three main purposes behind this collection. First, Grant simply wants you to read these historians who are so important as primary source on the classical world, see where some of the famous anecodotes so often repeated in cable documentaries actually come from, get a sense of the character of their writing. Second, Grant gives some basic information about each historian - when they lived, the works they wrote and which ones survived to our time, the extant of their personal involvement in what they write about, the merits and defects of their histories, and a bit on their political and literary influences on the modern world. Finally, by arranging the book in chronological order of the historians' lives, and not by language or order of their subjects, Grant develops an argument about how the art of history developed in the classical world and which writers were regarded as particularly admirable. Besides his own translation work (primarily on Tacitus and Suetonius), Grant has selected many other translators and all are fully credited if the reader wants to follow up and get their entire translation of a work. Grant's introduction and timeline puts the selections in a rough context for events in the ancient world. The book is extensively footnoted, and Grant often gives, in the titles to individual selections, the date of the event described. As to the span of time covered here, we have the migration of the Etruscans from Lydia and the founding of Thebes to the death of Emperor Valens at the Battle of Adrianople. Zeige 4 von 4 keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
A comprehensive anthology of the classical historians--from the early Greeks through the late Romans, right up to the beginnings of the Christian era. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeineBeliebte Umschlagbilder
Google Books — Lädt ... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)938History and Geography Ancient World Greece to 323Klassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
No matter what subject they are covering, the piece of writing is here in the order they were originally written. Introductionary essays for each historian are really nice overviews but with nice specificity. Maybe I need to re-evaluate Grant. Needless to say, my copy is staying on the shelf!