Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... Arsenic Under the Elms : Murder in Victorian New Havenvon Virginia A. McConnell
Keine Lädt ...
Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest. Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
The attorney Virginia A. McConnell provides a riveting view of Connecticut in the late 1800s as revealed through the unrelated but disturbingly similar murders of two young women. The first, Mary Stannard, was an unmarried mother who worked as a domestic and believed herself to be pregnant for a second time. The man accused of her murder, Reverend Herbert Hayden, was a married lay minister whose seduction of Mary was common knowledge. Three years later, Jennie Cramer, another woman of low social status, was found floating facedown in Long Island Sound off West Haven. The characters involved in the commission, investigation, and prosecution of these crimes emerge as vibrant individuals, and their stories shed light on many aspects of the Victorian world: sex and marriage; drugs, from arsenic to aphrodisiacs; forensic medicine; and courtroom procedures. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeine
Google Books — Lädt ... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)364.1523097468Social sciences Social problems and services; associations Criminology Crimes and Offenses Offenses against persons Homicide Murder History, geographic treatment, biography North AmericaKlassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
The most amazing thing about this book was finding out how very primitive the judicial system and procedures were at that time. Inquest jurors were expected to gather evidence and witness accounts on their own time and at their own expense. Tests that would have been helpful were not yet developed - or were just being understood by experts but not the public. Bribery was rampant. Attitudes of class hung heavy over victims who were poor. Evidence and testimonies were so muddled much of it became useless and severely crippled justice in both cases.
Autopsies were conducted in the backyard, living room, barn, whatever was convenient. Bodies were exhumed several times to get more information. Tests on organs took time that delayed trials or the judge would give orders to proceed without the results. It was all so crude compared to what is available today.
These were Victorian times. Gender roles heavily influenced the proceedings. Newspaper reporters of all persuasions published what they heard and saw at the trials with subjective slants. In Connecticut at this time there were no recorders during the trials. Witnesses kept changing their stories and there was nothing to refer back to what they had said previously.
All in all, this was interesting to a degree - and in a subject I generally don't know much about. The author did a good job gathering material and her writing was clear and readable. Of course her conclusions were her own.. very plausible... but too late to pursue or prove. ( )