Having done a bit of reading on World War II, I can say this: You can't go very far in the literature without running into the name "Max Hastings." And, usually, there's something approaching reverence in those mentions from other historians. But... (Warning: Shocking confession ahead.) I've never read "Armageddon." In fact, this was the FIRST Hastings' book I've read.

Now, when I obtained this book, I noticed a particular reader complain that the book seemed disjointed and rambling, especially when compared with his other works (none of which I've read yet). So, I didn't have that point of comparison; however, I think that LACK of familiarity with Hastings' other work freed me to enjoy the book for what it really was: An eminent contemporary historian-a titan in his field-share his favorite war stories.

Was it always clear why he had chosen this narrative over that or related this incident in detail while briefly summarizing another encounter? No. Was there some sort of easily-discernible progression? No.

But the book SUCCEEDS. Hastings wends his way through the history of modern warfare much the way a master gardener would pick a fresh bouquet for the dinner table. Variety is the source of beauty. It's the COLLAGE of stories as a whole that creates the book's impact and power.

And it shows us a historian with a heart. Hastings' is not a teller of events but an observer of people and I daresay a trained psychoanalyst couldn't do a finer job of exploring the psyche of the warrior and/or using such an exploration to delve into the highest values and dearest virtues that define human idealism.

A fine, fine read for both the student of history and the student of humanity. ( )

Very interesting stories about individual "warriors". Hastings' right-wing tendencies come through from time to time, although he doesn't seem to like Donald Rumsfeld. Generally, though, it is a balanced book. He tries to explore the disconnect between "civilisation" and the apparent need that societies have for ruthless killers during times of crisis. The vast majority of soldiers, sailors and aircrew do their bit competently enough, but he argues that battles are won due to a small number of extraordinary warriors who demonstrate courage, determination or leadership beyond the norm.

But the best thing about this book is simply that it tells gripping stories about some fascinating men and women. ( )