Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... Supreme Injustice: How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000von Alan M. Dershowitz
Keine Lädt ...
Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest. Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. I suppose I should like this book, like the rest of those who believe that justice was not served in the Bush v. Gore decision, but I found it unpleasant and in some places, downright nasty. There was even one point where it appeared the author's conclusions led to removal of human rights from one group of people (women who would leave a bad marriage). Overall, there are much better books written on the topic. This author's attitude smacks too much of superiority and self-righteousness for his arguments to be compelling. ( ) Generally I am not a huge fan of Dershowitz, but this is a solid book. He looks at the decisions written by all the Supremes and then compares that analysis to the decision to stop the recount in Florida in November 2000. It's a disturbing look at how an institution as central as the Supreme Court is as suspectible to cronyism as every other branch of government. Antonin Scalia is a scourge on the nation. Zeige 3 von 3 keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
Prestigeträchtige Auswahlen
The author examines "the U.S. Supreme Court's role in ending the presidential election of 2000 with its controversial ruling in Bush v. Gore."--Jacket. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeineBeliebte Umschlagbilder
Google Books — Lädt ... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)324.973Social sciences Political Science The political process Biography And History North America United StatesKlassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |