Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... Auf verlorenem Posten. Honor Harrington 01 (1993)von David Weber
Favorite Series (40) » 10 mehr Lädt ...
Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest. Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. Science fiction: The 1st book in a series. The book is about Honor Harrington and her ship the Fearless. She is sent to what amounts to a "backwater" location that parts of her government do not really want. She starts enforcing the laws that hadn't been enforced by the previous officer in charge. Doing this she finds a plan by another star system to try and push her people out and take over. The book wasn't bad. It was a little heavy on the world building in the beginning but I felt it found it's way part way through. This is a small lightly-armed naval cruiser of a page-turner that, after some tactical swerves and gyrations, accelerates into hyperspace in the last hundred pages. Ignore some of the cornier dialogue and clichéd characterisation, as well as some blood-and-guts gore, and you'll enjoy this remote star-system patrol through heavily-armoured heroism, military spaceware, and impeller-drive technobabble. Engage! The first book of Honor is the best. I read others, but with the book number getting up the impact got thinner and thinner. After 7 or 8 it all become meaningless for me. But the first... yes, it more like classic Bujold "put main cast in deep troubles and let the reader watch them struggle". That is what it all about and that is what Webber book after book changed for high scale politic clashes and deep blood bathes. Very popular and well known series, that I'm not convinced is worth me spending more time on. The military feel and detail I enjoyed, but the characters and plot were pretty uneven at best. I mean, it's cool the lead character is female, but other than her mild obsession with being unattractive, she is neuter at best. That just one of a dozen similar examples. I really did enjoy reading much of it, but the lasting impression was kinda weak. It has the feel of one of the myriad of later Pern novels, or other series that went on using formula writing for way too long, and this is only book one. Read it, just don't expect too much. keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
Honor Harrington hat einen Fehler begangen: Sie hat sich ihren Vorgesetzten zum Feind gemacht. In Unehren wurde sie daraufhin auf den kleinen Außenposten Basilisk versetzt. Ihre demoralisierte Mannschaft macht sie für diese Degradierung verantwortlich. Das Parlament weiß nicht, ob es den Sternensektor überhaupt behalten will, die ortsansässigen Händler sind Schmuggler und fordern Honors Kopf, ein benachbartes Sternenreich schmiedet dunkle Ränke - und Honor steht nur ein altersschwacher Raumkreuzer zur Verfügung. Doch ihre Gegner haben einen schrecklichen Fehler begangen: Sie haben Honor wütend gemacht ... Wenn C. S. Forester, der Autor der Horatio-Hornblower-Romane, Science Fiction geschrieben hätte: Dies hier wäre das Resultat. Start einer Serie in sich abgeschlossener Abenteuer. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeineBeliebte Umschlagbilder
Google Books — Lädt ... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813.54Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1945-1999Klassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
So first, the entertaining things.
'On Basilisk Station' has a good Space Opera plot told from a strongly military mindset. It has interstellar intrigue, internal political strife, a navy rife with nepotism and petty rivalries, baddies you can hiss at for the misogyny, narcissism and incompetence (amazing how often those three come as a set), military tactical problems with innovative solutions, lots and lots of hardware, space battles and ground battles, a brave Captain doing her duty against all the odds and slowly winning over her crew. Good, swashbuckling stuff.
The book didn't confine itself to a cosy, bloodless view of conflict and military life. It has an attempted rape, what amounted to a massacre of the (drug-crazed and armed) indigenous population and a huge number of deaths in a space battle. All of these things seemed to be taken for granted as regrettable but normal.
What disappointed me about the book wasn't the violence or ethos of armed imperialism, it was the writing.
David Weber has thoroughly thought through Honour Harrington's universe from the physics of space travel, through the structure, protocols and weapons of interstellar navies, to the history of the centuries-old Human Diaspora and the diverse political and social forms that have evolved as humans expanded into space. Unfortunately, he tends to share that knowledge, at length, through passages that read like Civil Service Ministerial briefings which get dumped so clumisly into the narrative that it feels as if the story has been interrupted by a lecture. Towards the end of the book when the tension was high as one military ship chased another, the narrative screeched to a halt as I was treated to what felt like a fifteen-minute essay on the history of the discovery of gravity waves and their impact on the speeds at which spacecraft can travel. The content was interesting but the presentation was uninspiring.
I was also disappointed in the thin characterisation of Honor Harrington. I liked her leadership style and the way she thought problems through but I learnt very little about her and what I did learn didn't make sense to me. Harrington can apparently plot complex routes and velocities through space with minimum computer assistance while under pressure but is unable to do more than scrape by in maths exams. I find this hard to believe. I also wonder at David Weber's intention in giving this omnicompetent character such an unlikely weakness. Throughout the book, Honor demonstrates an ability to read and influence the reactions of the people around her yet, in her internal monologue, she repeatedly describes herself as ugly, although no one around her seems to see her that way. So, Iam supposed to believe that Harrington suffers from body dysmorphia as well as selective descalulia. Why? I'd have no problem with the idea of Harrington being ugly and bad at math. What I struggle with is her belief that these decriptions apply to her when her actions and the reactions of others portray her as good at astrogation and having at least average goodlooks. It feels like a con.
Finally, I was deeply disappointed in Honor Harrington's Treecat, which came across as a docile companion animal that occasionally helped Harrington control her anger but showed no signs of sentience. So what was the point? Why did David Weber want Harrington to be a cat lady? My disappointment was sharpened because I've read 'A Beautiful Friendship' and 'Fire Season' which Weber wrote a decade later as part of a Young Adult prequel series starring one of Harrington's ancestors, in which we got inside the (alien but complex) minds of the Treecats.
'The Honor Of The Queen', the next Harrington book, has also been on my TBR for thirteen years. I'm sure I'll get around to it sometime but it will be behind reading more by C. J. Cherryh, Tanya Huff, Joel Shepherd and James Corey. ( )