If you ignore the fact that we (literally) lost one of our serving Prime Ministers in the 1960′s, relative to most countries in the world Australia’s political history is uneventful. We’ve had no civil wars, no major coups, our lone armed rebellion lasted a single day and for most of the 223 years of our political history you’d have had to look awfully hard to find more than six people holding anything approaching radical political beliefs. It is little wonder then that when a genuine political upheaval does occur it receives an enormous amount of attention. What is known colloquially as ‘the Petrov Affair’ is one of these events. Taking place in 1954 it involved the defection of a senior official from the Russian Embassy in Canberra and his wife who had both also been operating as spies. This sparked the Royal Commission on Espionage which in turn led to the severing of diplomatic relations between Australia and Russia until the end of the decade.

In Document Z Andrew Croome has provided a fictional account of these events from the point of view of the primary ‘players’: Vladimir Petrov, his wife Evdokia and the Polish/Australian spy who orchestrated Petrov’s defection. Croome says that using fiction allowed him to put his characters in every-day scenarios in a way that factual historians cannot For me, someone who has never been able to take the subject of spying seriously due to an early and prolonged exposure to Get Smart, I found this particularly effective as it showed that the art of spying is subject to the routines, mistakes, ordinariness and petty rivalries familiar to any workplace.

The story that Croome tells is personal rather than political. Vladimir is depicted as a womaniser, a petty thief and fairly unsuccessful spy. His decision to defect has a lot less to do with any deeply held beliefs than it does vested personal interest. His betrayal of his wife is in keeping with that character. Defecting alone, without telling her what he was up to, put Evdokia in an impossible situation because she had family in Russia whose safety she was worried for. Her story is just sad. Having lost her first husband to a Russian gulag she marries Vladimir more out of necessity than anything else. She appears to spend her entire life dealing with the real or imagined death of loved ones and, though she is stoic, it is quite heart breaking to read.

I have never been much engaged by the study of history as a series of dates and events to be remembered. In this confidently written novel Croome has provided the kind of history that is intriguing even if it is not entirely true (though the factual basis for his imaginings is evident). He shows us a reality that might very well have been. One in which there were innate problems in maintaining strong Marxist principles while living in a place that demonstrates daily that capitalism has its advantages and one in which people’s fears and worries don’t always (often?) lead them to do the laudable thing. As someone who has plowed through a considerable amount of the non-fiction available on this subject I found this fictional account offered the much-needed human element that is missing from so much historical writing. ( )

Super book -- one I'd definitely recommend. Document Z is a fictional re-imagining of a real event that took place in Australia during the Cold War years of the 1950s. I'd previously never heard of what ultimately became known as "the Petrov Affair," the defection of two Soviets working at the Soviet embassy in Canberra that ultimately revealed clandestine Soviet activity in different areas of Australia's government. Vladimir (Volodya) Petrov and his wife Evdokia held diplomatic posts at the embassy, but in reality they were also spies working for the MVD, the USSR's Ministry of Internal Affairs. Further exploration led to an incredible photo which mirrors the action occurring as the novel opens, that of Evdokia being escorted through a crowd at Sydney's then Mascot Airport by a couple of big, brawny minders whose job is to get her on a flight that will eventually take her back to Moscow after her husband defected. Then the crowd becomes a mob which tries to keep Evdokia from getting into the plane, trying to keep her in Sydney away from the possibility of Soviet reprisals.

The question Andrew Croome asks is how did it come down to this? The answer is laid out in this most intelligent and engaging novel as he reconstructs not only the events leading up to this particular day in 1954, but also as he imagines the inner turmoil of the Petrovs during their time at the Soviet embassy in Canberra, especially after the death of Stalin and the arrest of Beria become a major game changer. Added to the Petrovs, Croome brings in other players in the game, both Soviet and Australian, and also explores life for the Petrovs after their defections to some extent as well.

The story begins three years earlier introducing the Petrovs, moving through their daily work routines and their home life in Canberra. Coming to Australia from a post in Sweden, Evdokia is secretly a captain in MVD intelligence decrypting coded messsages but openly works for the ambassador, while ironically, the job of Vladimir (also a spy) is to prevent defections. But within the embassy it's all about power, political intrigue, and paranoia; the Petrovs often find themselves on the receiving end of trouble, with trumped-up charges that find their way back to Moscow in the ambassador's reports; no small worry for Evdokia who still has family back in the Soviet Union. They are also sure they are being watched constantly outside of the embassy, but they're not sure who is and is not an agent spying on them. Then the ambassador receives word of Stalin's death and Beria's arrest -- and when Evdokia and Vladimir are told that they are being replaced and will be returning home shortly thereafter, Vladimir, who has been secretly courted as ripe for defection, decides the time is right to make his move but tells Evdokia nothing.

Not only is the story behind the Petrov defections intriguing and compelling on its own, the author's re-imagining of their personal lives is also credible. There is not a great deal of emotion shared by this couple; often they come across as rather flat together but all the same their inner lives are in turmoil. Evdokia is constantly reminded of her dead daughter; Vladimir drinks, visits prostitutes and is faced with the life-changing experience of giving away his country's secrets. Add in the author's excellent depiction of the political atmosphere of the time, as well as the workings of the fledgling Australian Security Intelligence Organization (ASIO), and Document Z jumps way above the usual spy fare. In fact, after I finished the book and went on to read what I could about "The Petrov Affair," I was taken aback at the realistic tone of the author's rendition of this story. I had a hard time putting it down once I had it in my hands. ( )

As the blurb says, Canberra, 1951, the Cold War at its height. In Australia it all became very high profile with the defection of a Soviet spy and the drama around the Soviet's attempt to repatriate his wife to the USSR immediately. Whilst it's a true story, the "Petrov Affair" probably isn't that well known outside Australia - but it was quite an event here. DOCUMENT Z takes the true story as its basis, and fictionalises the viewpoint of the husband and wife - Evdokia and Vladimir Petrov.

The voices of these two are compelling, albeit very contained, almost dry - which seems perfectly apt given who they are and the timeframe in which the book is set. As the story is told it moves between day to day life within the Embassy (she worked for the Ambassador / he is an agent for Moscow Intelligence - MVD) and at home in the Canberra suburbs. The background to what life could have really been like for a Soviet couple transplanted to extremely English, very territorial, closed up 1950's Canberra is cleverly drawn out. Coming via Sweden wouldn't have helped as there is not only the differences between Soviet / Swedish sensibility and Australian society at that time - there's also the massive changes in climate and the dislocation that the extreme heat of Australia can cause - let alone in before air-conditioning, early development, tree-less Canberra within the cliques of the Embassy crowd.

The book carefully builds a picture of an Embassy riven by political intrigue and power-games, through to a society driven by much the same imperative and the precariousness of the situation of the two central characters who basically, were on the wrong side of an Ambassador. It takes you through the complications of trying to build a life, a home, a family in an environment where you can be moved / recalled at any stage. It shows the pressure that could be placed on people when they have family and loved-ones at home, and the regime is not afraid to use fear and pressure to ensure compliance. And it shows the paranoia and real intimidation that plays out in the game of spying.

When reading this book, the timeframe in which the action takes place, and the political climate and origins of the central characters need to be kept in the forefront of your mind. The delivery style seems very dry and almost flat in an Australian context, but somehow apt in a Soviet, Cold War environment where every word and action can be analysed, nuanced and used against you. The other thing that you really do need to keep reminding yourself of is that this is a fictional account. It's a measure of how well the book tells this story, that makes it really easy to forget that. ( )

The author has researched in detail the defection of the Petrovs from the Soviet Embassy in Canberra in 1953 and succeeds in re-creating the atmospherics of this high melodrama in Australian politics.

Croome tells the story of the defection from the point of view of Mrs Petrov, and her initial reluctance to follow her husband, a drunk, inept spy, provides the narrative arc of the book.

It is important for Australians to know this story, however, it only succeeded partly for me. There was not enough tension created, and frankly, I ended up not caring very much whether Petrova returned to Moscow or not. ( )

At last a Vogel winner not about rites of passage and water. Tightly written this novel is loosely based on the Petrov scandal of 1954 when two Russian Embassy staff, formerly Russian spies, defected to Australia. The characters are well developed and the plot moves along to its inevitable conclusion with the alacrity of a Canberra summer's afternoon. It throws some interesting light on what was then a huge and dramatic event leading to a manipulated re-election by the government of the day. ( )