StartseiteGruppenForumMehrZeitgeist
Web-Site durchsuchen
Diese Seite verwendet Cookies für unsere Dienste, zur Verbesserung unserer Leistungen, für Analytik und (falls Sie nicht eingeloggt sind) für Werbung. Indem Sie LibraryThing nutzen, erklären Sie dass Sie unsere Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie gelesen und verstanden haben. Die Nutzung unserer Webseite und Dienste unterliegt diesen Richtlinien und Geschäftsbedingungen.

Ergebnisse von Google Books

Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.

Lädt ...

Hopeful Monsters (1990)

von Nicholas Mosley

MitgliederRezensionenBeliebtheitDurchschnittliche BewertungDiskussionen
450855,195 (3.87)13
This Whitbread Book of The Year Award winner for 1990 is the final novel of the Catastrophe Practice series. Set in the 1920s and 30s it tells the story of two young radicals, Max and Eleanor, who meet, love, separate and come together again during the maelstrom of the Spanish Civil War.
Keine
Lädt ...

Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest.

Idea novels or conceptual novels are seldom literary gems. That is certainly the case with this book. Mosley has been smart enough to process a nice love story in his book, and at the same time evoke dramatic historic periods (especially the rise of Nazism and the Second World War). The passages that revolve around these themes are the easiest to read. But Mosley has given priority to the ideas and concepts, not to the story. Sometimes this is to be taken literally: the book contains numerous discussions about the major 20th Century developments in physics (relativity theory, quantum theory, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, etc.), biology (Darwinists versus Lamarckians and the genetic debate), psychology (the wars between different psychoanalysis schools), philosophy (Heidegger, Wittgenstein), the ideological (of course especially fascism and communism), etc. Ingenious and erudite, that is the least you can say.

But the uniqueness of this book is that Mosley illustrates all these perspectives by means of his concrete characters and what they experience or do: they constantly function in one of the above-mentioned scientific debates (for example, as particles that attract or repel each other, or who function as matter or wave according to the observer's point of view) and he constantly lets those characters, while they say or do certain things at the same time think of the underlying scientific-philosophical issues in themselves; and on top of that, Mosley again and again underlines the ethical implications of these ideas and actions. That gives a certain artificial character to the 'dramatis personae' (they literally seem to be actors who create their role and also undergo him at the same time). It takes quite some patience and attention to follow all this, and it makes the reading of this book utterly intriguing and difficult at the same time. Hence the very different reviews by the readers of this book, from wildly enthusiastic to absolutely horrified, and hardly anything in between. In the unlikely hope of being original, I opt for the ambiguous middle-opinion: this book is an incredible achievement of Mosley, but it is not a successful piece of fiction. ( )
  bookomaniac | Feb 19, 2018 |
An eloquent and complex novel of ideas - I remember finding this stimulating and enjoyable but would need to read it again to review it properly. ( )
  bodachliath | Nov 4, 2014 |
A fascinating novel of ideas, depicting the early lives of two characters, Max and Eleanor, in an almost epistolatory style, with each of them narrating alternate chapters, addressing the other as "you." The story takes place in Europe in the 1930s, a time of unrest (Nazi Germany, the development of the atomic bomb, the Spanish Civil War). Max and Eleanor make their way as best they can, exploring ideas and nurturing their love. The ideas are the main focus of the novel and it is through their ideas that the characters are built up and explored. This is not a novel for someone looking for a love story. I suspect that in order to like this novel, one must like ideas as much as one likes characters. Several times I put the book down to contemplate the ideas the book explores, not because it was difficult to understand, but because the ideas were so fascinating I wanted to give them room to breathe. ( )
  anneearney | Mar 31, 2013 |
First book I finished this year, and it really has taken me two years or so to get through it. There's nothing wrong with the book - it's amazing and I highly recommend it - it just requires a certain commitment and dedication on the reader's part. It isn't that it's a hard read. Maybe a bit like reading philosophy. Well, it is, I suppose. This book needs the right kind of readers, though, if that makes sense, so not everyone should expect to like it. At times, it's as if someone had an unbound textbook and an unbound novel and dropped them on the floor, not bothering to sort them after, and just publishing the juxtaposition together. And yet the writing somehow carries it all.
  taperry | Mar 9, 2009 |
I have tried, and tried, and tried, and tried to read and like this book. I can't; I hate it. I like the premise - organisms born a bit before their time which will succeed or fail, but don't, as they live, know whether they are monsters. I can't get by the artificial style.
My father said '----'
My mother said '----'
I thought - -----

or even worse,

I said '---'
I thought - ----

I guess I'll try again some day, but not this one.
  LizzieD | Jan 27, 2009 |
keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen

Gehört zur Reihe

Du musst dich einloggen, um "Wissenswertes" zu bearbeiten.
Weitere Hilfe gibt es auf der "Wissenswertes"-Hilfe-Seite.
Gebräuchlichster Titel
Die Informationen stammen von der englischen "Wissenswertes"-Seite. Ändern, um den Eintrag der eigenen Sprache anzupassen.
Originaltitel
Alternative Titel
Ursprüngliches Erscheinungsdatum
Figuren/Charaktere
Wichtige Schauplätze
Wichtige Ereignisse
Zugehörige Filme
Die Informationen stammen von der englischen "Wissenswertes"-Seite. Ändern, um den Eintrag der eigenen Sprache anzupassen.
Epigraph (Motto/Zitat)
Widmung
Erste Worte
Die Informationen stammen von der englischen "Wissenswertes"-Seite. Ändern, um den Eintrag der eigenen Sprache anzupassen.
If we are to survive in the environment we have made for ourselves, may we have to be monstrous enough to greet our predicament?
Zitate
Letzte Worte
Hinweis zur Identitätsklärung
Verlagslektoren
Werbezitate von
Originalsprache
Anerkannter DDC/MDS
Anerkannter LCC

Literaturhinweise zu diesem Werk aus externen Quellen.

Wikipedia auf Englisch (1)

This Whitbread Book of The Year Award winner for 1990 is the final novel of the Catastrophe Practice series. Set in the 1920s and 30s it tells the story of two young radicals, Max and Eleanor, who meet, love, separate and come together again during the maelstrom of the Spanish Civil War.

Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden.

Buchbeschreibung
Zusammenfassung in Haiku-Form

Aktuelle Diskussionen

Keine

Beliebte Umschlagbilder

Gespeicherte Links

Bewertung

Durchschnitt: (3.87)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2 4
2.5 2
3 5
3.5 5
4 19
4.5 3
5 13

Bist das du?

Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor.

 

Über uns | Kontakt/Impressum | LibraryThing.com | Datenschutz/Nutzungsbedingungen | Hilfe/FAQs | Blog | LT-Shop | APIs | TinyCat | Nachlassbibliotheken | Vorab-Rezensenten | Wissenswertes | 204,457,015 Bücher! | Menüleiste: Immer sichtbar