Autoren-Bilder
1 Werk 75 Mitglieder 1 Rezension

Über den Autor

Rebecca D. Cox is Assistant Professor of Education at Seton Hall University.

Werke von Rebecca D. Cox

Getagged

Wissenswertes

Für diesen Autor liegen noch keine Einträge mit "Wissenswertem" vor. Sie können helfen.

Mitglieder

Rezensionen

The title's a bit misleading. Cox exclusively treats Community College students, particularly their experience in introductory English composition courses. I can see it, then, being most useful for disciplines that expect students to produce analytical writing and for faculty at institutions, like mine, whose student body is largely "non-traditional." An important note: as Cox observes, "non-traditional" may be a misnomer, since only a 52% of students who graduated high school in 1992 and went to a 4-year institution attended that institution continuously until obtaining their degree; and a 1999 NCES survey "estimated that nearly 75 percent of all undergraduates possessed nontraditional characteristics and...28 percent were highly nontraditional" (6-7). In other words, it is the supposed "traditional" student--financially stable, from a college-savvy family, in his or her late teens or early 20s, a native English speaker, who finishes a degree in 4 or fewer years at a single institution--who is nontraditional, and we should rethink higher education with this in mind.

Most of the book anecdotally considers students' anxieties, motivations, and criteria for good instruction. The students' voices are worth hearing, of course, and not only as a corrective for rateyourstudents or the jumble of nonsense at ratemyprofessor (although I think many professors would be better instructors if they took those comments--and the student concerns they represent--more seriously). However, only the last two chapters, "Academic Literacies" and "Reimagining College from the Inside Out," really need to be read to 'get' Cox's argument. It is here, for example, that she engages most thoroughly with the fields of pedagogical theory and cognitive science, usefully for faculty (like me) underfamiliar with either one of these fields.

Here's the key passage:
Teachers' lack of understanding of students' assumptions and motivations exponentially magnified the difficulty of teaching. When instructors recognized the reasons for students' lackluster performance--whether in class or on assignments--they were much more likely to be able to shape students' beliefs and behavior. Indeed, by virtue of their professional authority, instructors exerted tremendous influence over students' sense of competence and willingness to seek assistance with coursework. Virtually across the board, an instructor's efforts to assuage students' fears functioned as an active invitation to take part in the class and marked the first step toward fostering the perception on the part of students that the coursework they were being asked to accomplish was challenging but "doable." In this way, the most promising pedagogical approach accomplished three crucial goals: it (a) demonstrated the instructor's competence in the field of student; (b) clarified both the instructor's expectations for student performance and the procedures for accomplishing the work; and (c) persuaded students that they were more than capable of succeeding. Achieving these results required that instructors be very clear and consistent in their messages to students and actively respond to students' conceptions of the course goals, instructional activities, and learning strategies. (163; my emphasis)

While other readers may benefit most from Cox's critique of the academic paradigm of gatekeeping (in which an institution's exclusive student body somehow indicates the quality of instruction) and her record of student expectations of professors (sadly, they tend to think of us as a kind of organic powerpoint, present only to to impart knowledge), I've emphasized what in Cox's book spoke most to me: managing student fear. It's true that most students tend to find the academic hunt for ambiguity pointless, that they do not want to "waste their time" on class discussion, that they want to study efficiently with an eye towards the test and, often, just towards getting through the class: and I can respond to each of these points by making my pedagogy and the class more transparent and, especially, by training students in "academic literacies" (perhaps with the help of a book like this). However, the hardest thing has simply been getting students to turn in work, particularly in Core classes, i.e., courses with nonmajors. Cox shows me that the students suffer, in essence, from impostor syndrome. They expect to turn in papers and discover that they don't belong in college. Students need low-stakes in class writing assignments (especially in the first few days of the semester) to acclimate them to submitting work, and faculty should return this work (not just keep it as a diagnostic) with encouraging comments amid the criticism. This may seem a simple point, but I know I failed at least one student this last semester for want of this.
… (mehr)
 
Gekennzeichnet
karl.steel | Apr 2, 2013 |

Statistikseite

Werke
1
Mitglieder
75
Beliebtheit
#235,804
Bewertung
½ 3.6
Rezensionen
1
ISBNs
3

Diagramme & Grafiken