William FriedkinRezensionen

A film starring Ellen Burstyn (Warner Bros., 1973).

A girl is possessed by the devil.

A (Great).

Sometimes when it tries to shock it goes too far, and almost makes me wonder why I'm watching this movie again. But the suspense is more than effective enough to overcome the faults.

(May 2023)½

Interview with the director of “M” & “Metropolis” (fonte: Imdb)

Quattro fuggitivi combattono per la libertà alla guida di alcuni camion che nascondono un carico di nitroglicerina. Un viaggio emozionante attraverso la selva sudamericana. (fonte: Mymovies)

2021 movie #191. 1985. Reckless Secret Service agent pursues a counterfeiter (William Defoe) who killed his partner. Famous chase scene against traffic on an LA freeway. And to turn the '80s vibe knob up to 11, the soundtrack is by Wang Chung. Dir. Friedkin's comeback.

A tracker helps the FBI find Evil Rambo.

2.5/4 (Okay).

Good fight scenes, and some good suspense. The character side of things needed some work. It feels long, but also feels like a lot was cut.

Festa per il compleanno del caro amico Harold è un film del 1970 diretto da William Friedkin, tratto da una pièce teatrale di Mart Crowley, primo film hollywoodiano a trattare il tema dell'omosessualità (fonte: Wikipedia)

I heard Friedkin plugging this memoir on The Dennis Miller Show and picked it up at the library. It didn’t disappoint. What makes it a good read is the fact that Friedkin knows that his name could be legally changed to The Guy Who Made The French Connection And The Exorcist but that he never discounts the importance of these films in his career or in the reader’s motives for reading the book: these two films get 100 pages each and what Friedkin reveals about them is interesting and illuminating. (I would list some of the more memorable items here, but anyone who picks up the book will not want these sections spoiled.) He never argues for the merits of his duds (The Night They Raided Minsky’s) but he also speaks earnestly enough about some of his overlooked films. The fact that I just added Sorcerer to my Netflix queue—despite a friend of mine with perfect movie judgment recently telling me that it isn’t any good—is proof of Friedkin’s writing.

At times, Friedkin can be a bit disingenuous, as when he feigns surprise that anyone would have been as shocked as they were by Cruising or that The Exorcist really “isn’t a horror film.” But these moments are rare. He is good on the topic of how Killer Joe received an NC-17 rating because the violence was “personalized” and that if (in the words of one ratings board member), “if it were just some guy dying, like in Saw, we wouldn’t care,” as well as how he became a director of opera. He is also mercifully tight-lipped about his marriages and personal life, again understanding that anyone who picks this up wants to read about movies. (It has about a tenth of the personal items one finds in The Kid Stays in the Picture.)

Part of the book’s draw is that the reader keeps thinking, How did this guy, so obviously intelligent and knowledgeable about filmmaking, not make more great movies? It’s a question Friedkin poses himself more than once in the book. Near the end, he states that he would have made better films overall if he had been born earlier and working at the height of the studio system, an assertion that the technical knowledge he displays throughout the book seems to uphold. One of his epigraphs from Samuel Beckett—“Fail better”—suits the book well and makes it as much about a man trying to do something meaningful with his life as it is about how to film a chase scene in New York.

His apprenticeship in television is interesting and the book as a whole is very well paced. I just wish he included the names of more films and directors he admires. Of course he mentions Hitchcock, Wells, Ford, Bergman—but he also calls Woody Allen “the best living American filmmaker.” Really? He also never mentions two of the biggest dogs on his resume: Deal of the Century and The Caretaker, which is odd, since much of the book is about what went wrong with films he was certain would be blockbusters (Jade, Blue Chips). At any rate, this is a fine memoir that I’m glad to have read. Friedkin’s voice is like the camera in a well-made film: it leads one on but never becomes the star of the show.

Two New York cops follow an unlikely drug smuggling lead.

Gripping and memorable. It doesn't amount to more than an action movie (albeit one of the best action movies ever made), which is a little surprising for a based-on-a-true-story Oscar winner - in a good way.

Concept: C
Story: C
Characters: C
Dialog: C
Pacing: A
Cinematography: B
Special effects/design: B
Acting: B
Music: A

Enjoyment: A

GPA: 2.9/4½

Just finished reading The Friedkin Connection, by William Friedkin (director of The French Connection, The Exorcist, Sorceror, and others). We had seen Friedkin after a showing of his movie Sorceror. Things he had said during the Q&A after the film had been very intriguing, so I bought his book, and had the opportunity to talk with him for a minute or two while he was autographing it. He was very charming and charismatic, and I just knew the book was going to be a great read.

It turned out to be a real treat. The stories behind the making of these films, and his more recent work as a director of operas (imagine being asked by Zubin Mehta to direct an opera, when you'd never even SEEN one before!), is a fascinating tale from start to finish. I kept stopping to read sections aloud to anyone who would listen - the stories he told were so mind-blowing.

It's also a very *personal* memoir, with an underlying theme of how his own character flaws have cost him greatly throughout the course of his career. It's a tale or perhaps more failures than successes, but a perfect example in my mind of how our negative traits have a flip side, a gift to give. I don't know if he realizes that the same arrogance and recklessness that caused him to reject many amazing opportunities (and make numerous other bad choices) is ALSO the source of his incredible gutsiness and drive for perfection which not only attracted all these opportunities (taken or otherwise) in the first place, but enabled him to take big risks and push on against tremendous odds to get the job done. And the results have been unique, powerful, iconic.

I highly recommend this book - certainly to anyone who loves film, but also to anyone who wants to know the stories behind the scenes, how films are made, how careers come together and rise (and fall), or who appreciates tales of courage, adventure and human frailty.

great movie-- concerning court martial of Marine Colonel -- who was doing his job. Rated R 127 minutes

1918

12-year-old Regan MacNeil begins to adapt an explicit new personality as strange events befall the local area of Georgetown. Her mother becomes torn between science and superstition in a desperate bid to save her daughter, and ultimately turns to her last hope: Father Damien Karras, a troubled priest who is struggling with his own faith. (source: TMDb)

A pair of NYC cops in the Narcotics Bureau stumble onto a drug smuggling job with a French connection. (IMDb)

104 minutos

122 minutos