M. Susan Lindee
Autor von The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon (Conversations in Medicine and Society)
Werke von M. Susan Lindee
The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon (Conversations in Medicine and Society) (1952) — Autor — 58 Exemplare
Getagged
Wissenswertes
Für diesen Autor liegen noch keine Einträge mit "Wissenswertem" vor. Sie können helfen.
Mitglieder
Rezensionen
Statistikseite
- Werke
- 4
- Mitglieder
- 87
- Beliebtheit
- #211,168
- Bewertung
- 4.5
- Rezensionen
- 2
- ISBNs
- 16
Nelkin and Lindee write, “The gene has become a way to talk about the boundaries of personhood, the nature of immortality, and the sacred meaning of life in ways that parallel theological narratives. Just as the Christian soul has provided an archetypal concept through which to understand the person and the continuity of self, so DNA appears in popular culture as a soul-like entity, a holy and immortal relic, a forbidden territory” (pg. 41). They continue, “The gene itself has been endowed with the qualities of a sacred object and the genome has become a fundamental text. In both the language of scientists and the parables of popular culture, the biological structure called DNA has assumed a nearly spiritual importance as a powerful and sacred object through which human life and fate can be explained and understood” (pg. 57).
Discussing social views, Nelkin and Lindee write, “The idea that ‘good’ and ‘bad’ character traits (and destinies) are the consequence of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ genes appears in a wide range of popular sources. In these works the gene is described in moral terms, and it seems to dictate the actions of criminals, celebrities, political leaders, and literary and scientific figures” (pg. 80). Further, “This construction of responsibility and blame suggests the ideological utility of genetic essentialism in the 1990s, for genetic explanations of individual actions have been incorporated into both popular media and social policy debates in ways that absolve the social order. Genetic deviance, a property of individuals and their DNA, relieves state and society of collective responsibility for the social conditions that foster violence. Genetic explanations therefore appeal to neoconservatives as a way to rail against the liberal, egalitarian theories of the 1960s” (pg. 129). They argue, “The rise of a new genetics – mediated not by state policy but by social and institutional pressure – is made more likely by certain ideas conveyed in popular culture. Stories of genetic essentialism and biological determinism facilitate public acceptance of the control of reproduction for the common good” (pg. 171).
Nelkin and Lindee conclude, “The narratives of mass culture shape what is seen in the world and what is invisible; what seems to be a problem and what promises solutions; what we take for granted and what we question. Today these narratives present the gene as robust and the environment as irrelevant; they devalue emotional bonds and elevate genetic ties; they promote biological solutions and debunk social interventions” (pg. 204).… (mehr)