John Rogers (1) (1961–)
Autor von The Matter of Revolution: Science, Poetry, and Politics in the Age of Milton
Andere Autoren mit dem Namen John Rogers findest Du auf der Unterscheidungs-Seite.
Werke von John Rogers
Getagged
Wissenswertes
- Geburtstag
- 1961
- Geschlecht
- male
- Nationalität
- USA (birth)
- Wohnorte
- Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
- Ausbildung
- Yale University
- Berufe
- English professor
- Organisationen
- Yale University
University of Toronto
Mitglieder
Rezensionen
Auszeichnungen
Dir gefällt vielleicht auch
Nahestehende Autoren
Statistikseite
- Werke
- 1
- Mitglieder
- 26
- Beliebtheit
- #495,361
- Bewertung
- 2.5
- Rezensionen
- 1
- ISBNs
- 126
- Sprachen
- 2
Rogers looks at one particular moment, in England around 1650, at the time of what Christopher Hill called "the revolution that never happened" (the Diggers and Levellers), when people from a surprisingly wide range of disciplines and political opinions became interested in an alternative kind of natural philosophy known as vitalism, which derives ultimately from the alchemical tradition of Paracelsus and is based on "the unity of matter and spirit as a self-active entity." This kind of thinking was used by the Digger leader Gerrard Winstanley to argue against tyranny and private property, by Margaret Cavendish to undermine patriarchy, by conservative poet Andrew Marvell to set the organic harmony of a garden (and the virginity of his teenage pupil Mary Fairfax...) against the political turmoil outside, and by royalist physician William Harvey to explain the circulation of the blood (it's not the heart that's in charge, but the blood itself that wants to be pumped).
Above all, of course, it was used by Milton in his scientific, historical and theological explanation of the universe in Paradise lost. Being Milton, and writing at a moment when the "inconsiderate multitude" had invited the Stuarts back and he himself was in a somewhat precarious political position, of course he doesn't use it in a straightforward way: his God is sometimes represented as constrained by the physical laws he has set himself, at other times as an authoritarian free to take arbitrary decisions as he thinks fit. Rogers has fun disentangling the apparent contradictions and suggesting how we should read them to try to make some sense of it all. A lot of this rests on understanding that what Scary-Archangel Michael tells Adam in his anticipatory history lesson in the last two books is determined by the particular didactic situation, and we shouldn't read it as though it is Milton talking to us. Interesting, and it was fun how this provided Rogers with his segue into Margaret Cavendish: what might Eve have been dreaming of whilst Adam was getting those two books' worth of higher education on top of the mountain? Could she have been anticipating the non-patriarchal, distributed-control universe of The blazing world...?… (mehr)