Autorenbild.

Ben Weider (1923–2008)

Autor von The Murder of Napoleon

13+ Werke 366 Mitglieder 7 Rezensionen

Über den Autor

Ben Weider is currently President of the International Napoleonic Society which has affiliated organisations in 30 countries.

Werke von Ben Weider

Zugehörige Werke

The Folio Book of Historical Mysteries (2008) — Co-Author: Was Napoleon Murdered?, einige Ausgaben106 Exemplare
Mr. Olympia: The history of bodybuilding's greatest contest (1983) — Einführung — 5 Exemplare
IFBB Album of Bodybuilding All-Stars (1979) — Einführung — 3 Exemplare

Getagged

Wissenswertes

Mitglieder

Rezensionen

I know that some do not agree with the facts stated in this book, but to me it shows complete proof that Napoleon was poisoned on orders from the French government. There is just too much evidence showing the murder. The facts have been suppressed by the French because it would be an embarrassment, especially because it was done by someone who was one of the staff of Napoleon who was there with him. The English, too, do not wants the facts known - he was their prisoner. Many years ago, before this book came out (along with "The Assassination of Napoleon"), I wondered how Napoleon, who was still young and healthy, would suddenly become ill and die. His symptoms were not those of cancer, the official cause of death. This is a very interesting book, a must for history buffs. It goes back and forth between the discovery by Sten Forshufvud of the poisoning in the late 20th century and the life of Napoleon on St Helena. The end of Napoleon is very sad, sick and dying with only a few followers....… (mehr)
 
Gekennzeichnet
CRChapin | 3 weitere Rezensionen | Jul 8, 2023 |
A good, brief look at the history of Napoleon and his battles. I don't know enough about the subject to know whether the premise is correct, that Napoleon was misjudged hero and a general force for good.
½
 
Gekennzeichnet
charlie68 | 1 weitere Rezension | Feb 28, 2016 |
Napoleon's death was not without controversy and there is evidence that he may have been poisoned. As a fascinating sidelight to the story of Napoleon, it appears that Count Charles-Tristan de Montholon, an aide to Napoleon and a member of the "pre-Revolutionary aristocracy" poisoned him slowly with arsenic (a poison) on St. Helena (Weider, p. 33).

Napoleon, although it was widely known that he had suffered from physical ailments his entire life (it appears to be the scratching disease, scabies, Napoleon's Glands, Arno Karlen, p. 7), had nonetheless a legendary reputation for work; yet, he succumbed at the relatively young age of 51 thus at the very least his death should raise questions.

At the time of Napoleon's death, the arsenic poisoning went unnoticed and it was not until a Swedish researcher in 1955, Sten Forshufvud, reconstructed the accounts and medical evidence of Napoleon's death that a modern, forensic connection could be established determining that Napoleon was murdered. Montholon had a motive, he was attached to the pre-Revolutionary aristocracy, and he appeared to be an agent of Count d'Artois, brother of King Louis XVIII, and later Charles X in the restored French monarchy who hated the Revolutionary Napoleon (Weider, pp. 144, 254).

Napoleon himself may have sensed something was amiss in his last days. Six days before his death he directed:

"After my death, which cannot be far off. I want you to open my body. . . . I want you to remove my heart, which you will put in spirits of wine and take to Parma, to my dear Marie-Louise [Napoleon's second wife]. . . . I recommend that you examine my stomach particularly carefully; make a precise, detailed report on it, and give it to my son. . . . I charge you to overlook nothing in this examination. . . . I bequeath to all the ruling families the horror and shame of my last moments."

(Wieder, preface).
… (mehr)
1 abstimmen
Gekennzeichnet
gmicksmith | 3 weitere Rezensionen | Nov 8, 2009 |
This was a gift from my son Parker, which I had asked for, so I really wanted to like it, but unfortunately, it is really not a very good book. The argument in favor of Napoleon is based almost entirely on assertions:essentially, the book says "Napoleon was good," with no facts to back it up.
 
Gekennzeichnet
wfzimmerman | 1 weitere Rezension | May 25, 2009 |

Dir gefällt vielleicht auch

Nahestehende Autoren

Statistikseite

Werke
13
Auch von
3
Mitglieder
366
Beliebtheit
#65,730
Bewertung
½ 3.6
Rezensionen
7
ISBNs
38
Sprachen
5

Diagramme & Grafiken