Wikipedia images

ForumAuthor and venue pictures

Melde dich bei LibraryThing an, um Nachrichten zu schreiben.

Wikipedia images

Dieses Thema ruht momentan. Die letzte Nachricht liegt mehr als 90 Tage zurück. Du kannst es wieder aufgreifen, indem du eine neue Antwort schreibst.

12wonderY
Jun. 13, 2010, 2:51 pm

I really am trying to understand how to correctly post author pictures, and I've read the guidelines multiple times, and I'm still getting some images flagged.

I thought LT adheres to the same standard as Wiki, so that it would be safe to take a photo from the author page at Wikipedia.

Please explain why this ain't so.

2AndrewB
Bearbeitet: Jun. 13, 2010, 3:23 pm

Have you read the where's my picture? article on WikiThing? There are a number of reasons why your photos may be getting flagged, most of which are listed there.

One of which says you cannot just "take" a picture from Wikipedia/media, it all depends on the license that's applied to the photo. Fair-use doesn't apply to LibraryThing.

3lilithcat
Jun. 13, 2010, 3:52 pm

> 1

As AndrewB said, Wikipedia often relies on fair use, which does not apply to LibraryThing, and it's also not uncommon for people to upload images to Wikipedia improperly. So we do need to verify. That's why you do need to link to the place where you found an image.

It's also necessary to credit the images correctly. For example, in the case of one of the images you uploaded, that of Harold MacGrath, the Wikipedia photo page shows that the image comes from the Library of Congress' George Grantham Bain collection (see http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/ggb2004005197/). You should always credit the original creator and source, where possible. (You wouldn't, for instance, credit me if I put the image on my blog! Same goes for Wikipedia. They didn't create the image.)

42wonderY
Jun. 13, 2010, 5:57 pm

ah! It is becoming clearer.

Thank you.

5timspalding
Jun. 13, 2010, 6:03 pm

Wikipedia often relies on fair use, which does not apply to LibraryThing

To be clear, we are operating as if it doesn't apply. Whether it actually applies or not is unclear. We're playing it safe. (A high-ground attitude that bothers me a lot, since nobody else pays any attention to it online.)

6lilithcat
Jun. 13, 2010, 6:21 pm

> 5

A high-ground attitude that bothers me a lot . . .

Well, you could change it. You are the boss, after all! You are the omnipotent power-that-is!

;-))

7Collectorator
Jun. 13, 2010, 7:32 pm

Dieses Mitglied wurde von der Website gesperrt.

82wonderY
Jun. 14, 2010, 6:57 am

>5 timspalding:

"Whether it actually applies or not is unclear."

I'm glad to hear that lack of clarity is universal and not just in my head, then. I thought I might be really blanking on this.

9timspalding
Jun. 14, 2010, 1:42 pm

It's a tricky thing. "Fair use" is a test, weighing factors, not a black/white thing.