![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/0804719691.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... Der unwissende Lehrmeister (1987)von Jacques Rancière
![]() Keine Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. ![]() ![]() I liked it. I liked it enough that I kept a copy of it... somewhere. I liked it enough to use it in an paper on the relationship between emancipation and modern continental political philosophy from Kant to now. However, the way it was written sucked. It could've been much, much better — and shorter. In time, when I read the word "calypso," I yearned to reach for a Browning. Zeige 3 von 3 keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
This extraordinary book can be read on several levels. Primarily, it is the story of Joseph Jacotot, an exiles French schoolteacher who discovered in 1818 an unconventional teaching method that spread panic throughout the learned community of Europe.Knowing no Flemish, Jacotot found himself able to teach in French to Flemish students who knew no French; knowledge, Jacotot concluded, was not necessary to teach, nor explication necessary to learn. The results of this unusual experiment in pedagogy led him to announce that all people were equally intelligent. From this postulate, Jacotot devised a philosophy and a method for what he called "intellectual emancipation"--a method that would allow, for instance, illiterate parents to themselves teach their children how to read. The greater part of the book is devoted to a description and analysis of Jacotot's method, its premises, and (perhaps most important) its implications for understanding both the learning process and the emancipation that results when that most subtle of hierarchies, intelligence, is overturned.The book, as Kristin Ross argues in her introduction, has profound implications for the ongoing debate about education and class in France that has raged since the student riots of 1968, and it affords Rancière an opportunity (albeit indirectly) to attack the influential educational and sociological theories of Pierre Bourdieu (and others) that Rancière sees as perpetuating inequality. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeineBeliebte Umschlagbilder
![]() GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)370.1Social sciences Education Education Theory of education; Meaning; AimKlassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:![]()
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |