Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... Tension City: Inside the Presidential Debates, from Kennedy-Nixon to Obama-McCainvon Jim Lehrer
Keine Lädt ...
Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest. Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. Jim Lehrer has assembled a nice retrospective on televised presidential debates and on his experience as a moderator. Lehrer, anchor of PBS NewsHour and moderator of eleven presidential debates, is pleanty familiar with the subject matter and presents it with the same level-headed coolness that comes across in his televised persona. Lehrer conjures up the controversies and game changers-"major moments" in his own terminology-but discusses the human factors over the political rhetoric. Through personal anecdotes and interviews with the participants Lehrer gives the personal side of the story, a story of three men in the most public forum with the highest stakes "walking down the blade of a knife" where anything from tone of voice to body language can change the face of everything. Tension City reads quick and stays on point, Lehrer is not hear to make judgements but to fill out the story. I recommend it for just about anyone. Being someone who generally reads fiction, the point of this book was pretty much lost on me. To me it seemed like a lot of anecdotes all thrown together in an order that didn't really make sense to me. I couldn't really see any difference in subject matter from one chapter to another (which was probably more a "me problem" than anything but it made it more difficult, personally, to get through) Overall I did think that some of the subject matter, as well as the quotes from famous political figures of our time, was really cool but the general organization of the book confused me and made it more difficult to read and understand. There didn't seem to be a general point, idea, or message, just a collection of "things that happened". While as a Washingtonian I have always considered myself a political person, this is not a subject I have ever chosen to read about in books. It was hearing Jim Lehrer speak about Tension City at a conference, I think, that got me to pick it up. That, and the unintimidating page count. Still, I’m almost surprised by how much I enjoyed the book. One of the things that worked for me is how personal the subject matter is to journalist Lehrer. This isn’t just a book about famous moments (and their aftermaths) in the last 40-some years of political debates; it’s about Lehrer’s personal experiences as moderator of 11 presidential or vice-presidential debates since 1988. To that extent, Tension City has elements of memoir, and a strong undercurrent of journalism within the subject matter. Lehrer reflects on the highs and lows of his performances and those of his colleagues over the years. I now have a far greater appreciation of the role of a debate moderator, and doubt I will watch future presidential debates with the same eyes. Still, it’s the politics and history that were most riveting, because these debates did change history. Had he answered one question differently, might Michael Dukakis have had a shot at the White House? We can never know, but there is room for speculation. I so clearly remember so many of the moments that Lehrer singles out over the past several decades. They were the water cooler moments that the entire nation was talking about the next day. But here we have the added perspective of time as we look at these famous exchanges. Plus, Lehrer has the prestige and the relationships to get the major players to speak frankly about events of the past. So, for example, Lloyd Bentsen and Dan Quayle share recollections of “Senator, you’re no Jack Kennedy.” This is the history of my lifetime. I was fascinated. Tension City is a brief book, and many serious political and history junkies will be looking for something more in-depth. For them, this book might work as a light companion volume. But for this reader, Mr. Lehrer’s book was the perfect introduction to uncharted literary territory. Zeige 5 von 5 keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
History.
Politics.
Sociology.
Nonfiction.
HTML:With an update by the author for the 2012 election. A veteran newsman who has presided over eleven presidential and vice-presidential debates, Jim Lehrer gives readers a ringside seat for some of the epic political battles of our time, shedding light on all of the critical turning points and rhetorical faux pas that helped determine the outcome of Americas presidential elections. Drawing on his own experiences as the man in the middle seat, in-depth interviews with the candidates and his fellow moderators, and transcripts of key exchanges, Lehrer illuminates what he calls the Major Moments and killer questions that defined the debates, from Kennedy-Nixon to Obama-McCain. In this paperback edition, he also offers his expert analysis of the 2012 Republican primary debates. Asked to sum up his experience as a participant in high-level televised debates, President George H. W. Bush memorably likened them to an evening in tension city. In Jim Lehrers absorbing account, we find out that truer words were never spoken. A brisk and engaging memoir.The Washington Post Enthralling . . . remarkable . . . a wonderful political memoir.Bookreporter A really good read . . . [There is] no debating quality of Jim Lehrers book.Associated Press Jim Lehrer is a national monument, and this riveting book shows how he became Americas moderator.Michael Beschloss, author of Presidential Courage A political junkies backstage pass.The Capital Times. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeineBeliebte Umschlagbilder
Google Books — Lädt ... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)324.7Social sciences Political Science The political process CampaigningKlassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
As a bonus if you happen to listen to the audiobook, Jim Lehrer narrates and 90% of the presidential quotes come directly from the live debates or from follow-up interviews with the candidates. Hearing a candidate's own voice is a historical treat, one that's impossible from the book alone. ( )