![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/0995455007.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.
Lädt ... The Question Concerning Technology in China: An Essay in Cosmotechnics (Urbanomic / Mono)von Yuk Hui
![]() Keine Keine aktuelle Diskussion zu diesem Buch. keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
"Heidegger's landmark critique of modern technology and its relation to metaphysics has been widely accepted in the East. Yet the conception that there is only one-originally Greek-type of techne has been an obstacle to any original critical thinking of technology in modern Chinese thought. This book argues for the urgency of imagining a specifically Chinese philosophy of technology capable of responding to Heidegger's conception and problematizing the affirmation of technics and technologies as anthropologically universal. Yuk Hui's systematic historical survey of Chinese thought in comparison to the antique philosophy in Europe explains why there is no systematic thinking of technics in Chinese thought. His subsequent investigation of the historical-metaphysical questions of modern technology, drawing on Lyotard, Simondon, and Stiegler, then sheds new light on the obscurity of the question of technology in China. Why has time never been a real question for Chinese philosophy, how has the category of Qi transformed in its relation to Dao in Chinese metaphysical discourse, and how might Chinese thought contribute to a renewed questioning of globalized technics?" --Publisher description. Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden. |
Aktuelle DiskussionenKeine
![]() GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)601Technology General Technology Philosophy and theoryKlassifikation der Library of Congress [LCC] (USA)BewertungDurchschnitt:![]()
Bist das du?Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor. |
One very simple note: one question that this book brought up for me was "why tradition?" Why does China have to develop its response to modernity from a historical Chinese cosmology? If it's true that the ties to past systems of belief have been completely severed, isn't the situation so far gone that we might as well start from scratch, or from a curated hodgepodge of whatever we find useful in all the traditions of the world? Hui never really says why such an approach would be misguided, but it seems deeply important to his project that, broadly, new alternatives to modern capitalist technics be based on local philosophical history. Does that insistence on continuity with the past come from a conviction that it isn't quite as gone from our thinking as it seems, or is it just impossible to start a cosmological project from scratch in a world where the default conception of nature we're trying to critique also pervades our entire social experience? These questions don't just apply to China; as with everything in the book, China is one (very important) case in a world full of cultures coming to a reckoning with the shortcomings in the transplanted technical thinking that, at this point, is almost completely international. (