Mike Stocks

Some changes were made to the three classic horror stories Dracula, Frankenstein and Jekyll&Hyde for "modern readers". I didn't agree with every change, but all in all they didn't affect the underlying story.

**spoilers**
For example at the end of Frankenstein the monster decides to live in the Arctic however long this may be, instead of to killing himself. This removes the finality of the original story and leaves a somewhat open ending. I'd like to think Frankenstein's creation is still somewhere out there.

Another change was a clearer description how Frankenstein creates the monster. In this retelling he uses part of his thigh instead of quote "The dissecting room and the slaughter-house furnished many of my materials".

As far as I can remember (it's been a while since I bought the book) this collections was written for children, so this might explain the afore mentioned change. Furtheremore in this version Frankenstein clearly uses electricity to bring the monster to life, like in most adaptions of the novel I've seen.… (mehr)

I bought this book because I'd had some minor dealings with the author, via his editorship of the excellent poetry magazine 'Anon'. I wasn't at all sure it would be my cup of tea, though, and it did take me several attempts to get into it at first. But when I finally sat down to give it a fair trial and got through the first few pages, I soon began to see what a very good book it really is. It's been described by Sarah Dunant as a 'serious comic novel' and that sums it up nicely. It's serious in that it reads as a highly authentic insight into life in modern India, and deals with issues of faith and mysticism and the power of the unsaid. It's comic in that it offers dry, often dark humour from beginning to end, whether in relation to the absurdities of domestic life or the equally absurd machinations of the political world. For anyone who's interested in a poignant, thought-provoking and entertaining book, this one comes highly recommended.… (mehr)