Simon Young (3)Rezensionen
Autor von Designer Evolution: A Transhumanist Manifesto
Andere Autoren mit dem Namen Simon Young findest Du auf der Unterscheidungs-Seite.
Rezensionen
Diese Seite verwendet Cookies für unsere Dienste, zur Verbesserung unserer Leistungen, für Analytik und (falls Sie nicht eingeloggt sind) für Werbung. Indem Sie LibraryThing nutzen, erklären Sie dass Sie unsere Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie gelesen und verstanden haben. Die Nutzung unserer Webseite und Dienste unterliegt diesen Richtlinien und Geschäftsbedingungen.
Young makes things harder for himself, it seems to me, by taking a libertarian political stance, and thus adopting a too-positive view of humanity as it is now. (Libertarians, apart from "socialist libertarians" such as Chomsky and me [?!], fail to recognize that strong government is needed to protect people from each other.) The case for transhumanism becomes even stronger when present-era humanity's incorrigible cussedness is conceded.
Another bothersome contention of Young's is that a certain _dualist_ position on the mind/brain issue is correct, albeit not the ridiculous immortal-souls variety of dualism. I have always found anti-dualism arguments, such as those of philosopher Daniel Dennett, to be completely convincing. On the other hand, I am also sympathetic to the idea that the mind is, in principle, copiable and/or uploadable, and authors such as Young and roboticist Hans Moravec claim that copiability/uploadability entails (a kind of) dualism. I wonder if they are right, and I wonder how Dennett would answer them. (Dennett is friendly toward strong AI, which contemplates the possibility of artificial consciousness and, I would think, copiability/uploadability.) Maybe it's all nothing but arbitrary terminology, but I sure don't want to be classed as any kind of dualist if it's at all avoidable.