Any time you make a review or release anything to the world, you make a snapshot of a particular time and sensibility. The smallest thing can affect the mood of the reviewer; perhaps they did not have breakfast that morning, or maybe they never really liked a particular genre or idea. In any case, whenever something is published or printed, it becomes dated in several weeks. With the advent of the internet, this turnover rate has increased further, to the point where I don’t know what is hip with the kids of today.

Books of the Century is a collection of reviews, interviews, essays and short pieces called first impressions from the New York Times Book Review Column. The main thing that this shows is that no person or reviewer is infallible. They may dislike or hate something for little reason, or for a huge reason. Starting its coverage back on the date of February 20, 1897, with a review of The Spoils of Poynton by Henry James and ending on October 5, 1997, with a review of Underworld by Don Delillo, the book does indeed cover a century. This fact makes the book an interesting talking point. For instance, there are some reviews of books that were successful but not well received at the time of publication. These are headlined as “Oops.”

The other interesting thing about this book is that it covers reviews of things that I wouldn’t have seen fit to review. For example, one of the reviews is about a collection of Crossword Puzzles. It discusses this “fad” with an air of interest. I guess I just assumed that Crossword Puzzles always existed in newspapers. I never thought of it as having a beginning that one could record. However, given the rise of Sudoku puzzles as of late, I suppose it was naive of me to think in that manner.

Alongside the reviews and all of that are little asides that describe events that happened in the years covered. It mainly covers things that happened in the world of literature. Did you know that 1949 was the first time the reviewer’s name was printed alongside the review? I didn’t, but now I do.

So this book is pretty good. It is not even flawed in the sense that it is printed material since it is a printed collection of reviews on printed material. The meta goes deep with this one. While I wouldn’t be interested in buying it new, I would get it from the library or purchase it secondhand. ( )

excellent reference book and a great place to start when looking for a book to read. ( )

Books about Books, Anthology

Selected book reviews, letters, essays, commentary, and Editor's Choice lists from the New York Times Book Review, beginning with Henry James, The Spoils of Poynton, in the Feb. 20, 1897 issue and ending with Don DeLillo. Underworld, in the Oct. 5, 1997 issue. There is an index. In his introduction, Charles McGrath aptly described the book as offering "a vivid, entertaining, and at least occasionally enlightening sense of literary immediancy--of what it was like, of initial and immediate reaction, when some of the most important or influential books of the century first came to view." ( )

Op het WorldWideWeb is het boekenarchief van de New York Times met zo'n 50.000 recensies het beste en meest uitgebreide overzicht van informatie over boeken dat er is. Sinds enige tijd ontvang ik iedere week een e-mail met daarin informatie over nieuw verschenen boeken. Ook lees ik zeer regelmatig oudere artikelen om ideeën op te doen voor nieuwe boeken om te lezen. De recensies zijn vrijwel altijd goed geschreven, bieden veel informatie en zijn niet te lang (gemiddeld 2 A4-tjes).
IN 1997 bestond de "Book Review" van de New York Times 100 jaar. Deze gelegenheid werd aangegrepen om de oude jaargangen door te bladeren en daar een flinke hoeveelheid boekrecensies, essays en interviews uit te halen om daar een boek mee te vullen. Het boek is voor een veellezer als ik zeer onderhoudend, enerzijds om te lezen wat er is geschreven over boeken die ik ook heb gelezen en anderzijds om ideeën op te doen voor nog te lezen boeken. Omdat de stukjes maar een paar blz beslaan leent het boek zich goed om er iedere dag een halfuurtje in te lezen. Een waarschuwing: de mensen van de "Book Review" zijn zeer gelletterd en gebruiken veel moeilijke woorden. Voor de leesfanaat!
UItgelezen: woensdag 27 december 2000 ( )