StartseiteGruppenForumMehrZeitgeist
Web-Site durchsuchen
Diese Seite verwendet Cookies für unsere Dienste, zur Verbesserung unserer Leistungen, für Analytik und (falls Sie nicht eingeloggt sind) für Werbung. Indem Sie LibraryThing nutzen, erklären Sie dass Sie unsere Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie gelesen und verstanden haben. Die Nutzung unserer Webseite und Dienste unterliegt diesen Richtlinien und Geschäftsbedingungen.

Ergebnisse von Google Books

Auf ein Miniaturbild klicken, um zu Google Books zu gelangen.

Lädt ...

Madame Bovary's Ovaries: A Darwinian Look at Literature

von David P. Barash

MitgliederRezensionenBeliebtheitDurchschnittliche BewertungDiskussionen
273997,522 (3.33)9
What can elephant seals tell us about Homer's Iliad? How do gorillas illuminate the works of Shakespeare? What do bloodsucking bats have to do with John Steinbeck? MADAME BOVARY'S OVARIES A Darwinian Look at Literature According to evolutionary psychologist David Barash and his daughter Nanelle, the answers lie in the most important word in biology: evolution. Just like every animal from mites to monkeys, our day-to-day behavior has been shaped by millions of years of natural selection. So it should be no surprise to learn that the natural forces that drive animals in general and Homo sapiens in particular are clearly visible in the creatures of literature, from Henry Fielding's Tom Jones all the way to Helen Fielding's Bridget Jones. Seen through the lens of evolutionary biology, the witty repartee of Jane Austen's courting couples, Othello's tragic rage, the griping of Holden Caulfield, and the scandalous indiscretions of Madame Bovary herself all make a fresh and exciting kind of sense. The ways we fall in--and out--of love, stand by our friends, compete against our enemies, and squabble with our families have their roots in biological imperatives we share not only with other primates but with an amazing array of other creatures. The result is a new way to read, a novel approach to novels (and plays) that reveals how human nature underlies literature, from the great to the not-so-great. Using the cutting-edge ideas of contemporary Darwinism, the authors show how the heroes and heroines of our favorite stories have been molded as much by evolution as by the genius of their creators, revealing a gallery of characters from Agamemnon to Alexander Portnoy, who have more in common with birds, fish, and other mammals than we could ever have imagined. As engaging and informative as a good story, Madame Bovary's Ovaries is both an accessible introduction to a fascinating area of science and a provocatively sideways look at our cherished literary heritage. Most of all, it shows in a delightfully enteraining way how science and literature shed light on each other.… (mehr)
Keine
Lädt ...

Melde dich bei LibraryThing an um herauszufinden, ob du dieses Buch mögen würdest.

Two biologists (father and daughter) set out to explain literature from a Darwinian point of view — but it ends up being the other way round, in that they give us the evolutionary background to a particular group of animal social behaviours and then use the plots of great works of literature to illustrate at a very superficial level what they mean. All quite entertaining, but not very new if you’ve read other popular science books about evolution (Dawkins & co.). Their ideas about literature don’t seem to involve anything beyond the plot, and it doesn’t really deepen our understanding of Jane Austen very much to know that female animals have good evolutionary reasons for being choosy when it comes to picking partners (for example). ( )
  thorold | Apr 20, 2024 |
Bleugh. Crappy evolutionary psychology at its worst. Did not finish. ( )
  katebrarian | Jul 28, 2020 |
As one might expect from the title, this book takes a light-hearted look at the way in which biological imperatives drive the characterization and plot of many pieces of classic literature.

Briefly put, that biological imperative is to send one's genes into the future, and to do so by choosing the partner best equipped to get them there. Pretty straightforward and Darwinian, if not overly romantic.

The authors try valiantly to expand this simple concept to fill 358 pages, and as one might expect, it gets a little iffy at times. They do fine when making the notion of "biologic fitness" comprehensible, and choose interesting (if sometimes obvious) pieces of literature to demonstrate what that means to fictional characters.

But the whole thing falls apart when they get beyond traditional parenting and wander off into the biological basis for altruism in non-related subjects. and the notion of "selected kinship", in which individuals from another genetic line are offered the social/cultural amenities normally reserved for offspring or potential mates.

By the time they get to the subject of adoption and beyond that to non-sexual buddy literature ('Three Musketeers', anyone?) the whole biological imperative thing seems to be left in the dust. Same-sex relationships don't even get a passing glance.

As pop science goes, it's an entertaining read, but it will hardly revolutionize one's view of Madame Bovary -- or any of the other literary creations it attempts to shoehorn into the premise. ( )
1 abstimmen LyndaInOregon | Feb 25, 2019 |
An adequate and readable application of evolutionary psychology to literature. The examples are all relatively simplistic; sure, selection pressure explains why Othello is jealous, why Madame Bovary is ambitious, and why the Corleone family sticks together; the problem is the authors never caution that this is very difficult to rigorously test. I can see this as sort of a gentle introduction to evolutionary psychology for humanities majors; there are just enough examples from the natural world to demonstrate that biologists aren’t making stuff up; I fear, though problems in two directions: people on the humanities side just unable to grasp the scientific method and ranting on the temerity of scientists intruding into the sacred halls of philosophy and literature (see David Stove and Mary Midgely versus Richard Dawkins or F.R. Leavis versus C.P. Snow) or overenthusiastic adoption without awareness of the difficulty of falsifying evolutionary psychology (sort of the way people in the humanities swallowed Freudian psychiatry hook, line and sinker for years). Reads fast, adequate references; the choice of what counts as “literature” might be arguable. ( )
  setnahkt | Dec 15, 2017 |
Ack. The epilogue, in which the authors clarify that 'literature is more than biology,' should have come first. I spent the whole time reading this book (in little bits at a time, over weeks) being frustrated with 'our genes make us do it and that's what makes for classic literature.'

Well, now I know a bunch of books I don't need to get around to reading. I don't care about insights into base human nature - I want to read about people rising above instinct, making thoughtful choices, exercising the skills we have to evaluate our actions, foresee consequences, etc.

If you're a lit. nerd, you might like to see your fav. classics through this 'new' lens.

If you're a science nerd, and already know that we are, at core, survival machines for genes," you might like to see how writers have struggled through the ages to say that in a story form.

I, personally, am both, actually. So I was pretty darn bored. This would have made a better article, not a whole book." ( )
  Cheryl_in_CC_NV | Jun 6, 2016 |
keine Rezensionen | Rezension hinzufügen
Du musst dich einloggen, um "Wissenswertes" zu bearbeiten.
Weitere Hilfe gibt es auf der "Wissenswertes"-Hilfe-Seite.
Gebräuchlichster Titel
Originaltitel
Alternative Titel
Ursprüngliches Erscheinungsdatum
Figuren/Charaktere
Wichtige Schauplätze
Wichtige Ereignisse
Zugehörige Filme
Epigraph (Motto/Zitat)
Widmung
Erste Worte
Zitate
Letzte Worte
Hinweis zur Identitätsklärung
Verlagslektoren
Werbezitate von
Originalsprache
Anerkannter DDC/MDS
Anerkannter LCC

Literaturhinweise zu diesem Werk aus externen Quellen.

Wikipedia auf Englisch

Keine

What can elephant seals tell us about Homer's Iliad? How do gorillas illuminate the works of Shakespeare? What do bloodsucking bats have to do with John Steinbeck? MADAME BOVARY'S OVARIES A Darwinian Look at Literature According to evolutionary psychologist David Barash and his daughter Nanelle, the answers lie in the most important word in biology: evolution. Just like every animal from mites to monkeys, our day-to-day behavior has been shaped by millions of years of natural selection. So it should be no surprise to learn that the natural forces that drive animals in general and Homo sapiens in particular are clearly visible in the creatures of literature, from Henry Fielding's Tom Jones all the way to Helen Fielding's Bridget Jones. Seen through the lens of evolutionary biology, the witty repartee of Jane Austen's courting couples, Othello's tragic rage, the griping of Holden Caulfield, and the scandalous indiscretions of Madame Bovary herself all make a fresh and exciting kind of sense. The ways we fall in--and out--of love, stand by our friends, compete against our enemies, and squabble with our families have their roots in biological imperatives we share not only with other primates but with an amazing array of other creatures. The result is a new way to read, a novel approach to novels (and plays) that reveals how human nature underlies literature, from the great to the not-so-great. Using the cutting-edge ideas of contemporary Darwinism, the authors show how the heroes and heroines of our favorite stories have been molded as much by evolution as by the genius of their creators, revealing a gallery of characters from Agamemnon to Alexander Portnoy, who have more in common with birds, fish, and other mammals than we could ever have imagined. As engaging and informative as a good story, Madame Bovary's Ovaries is both an accessible introduction to a fascinating area of science and a provocatively sideways look at our cherished literary heritage. Most of all, it shows in a delightfully enteraining way how science and literature shed light on each other.

Keine Bibliotheksbeschreibungen gefunden.

Buchbeschreibung
Zusammenfassung in Haiku-Form

Aktuelle Diskussionen

Keine

Beliebte Umschlagbilder

Gespeicherte Links

Bewertung

Durchschnitt: (3.33)
0.5 1
1 1
1.5 1
2 2
2.5
3 17
3.5 1
4 11
4.5 1
5 4

Bist das du?

Werde ein LibraryThing-Autor.

 

Über uns | Kontakt/Impressum | LibraryThing.com | Datenschutz/Nutzungsbedingungen | Hilfe/FAQs | Blog | LT-Shop | APIs | TinyCat | Nachlassbibliotheken | Vorab-Rezensenten | Wissenswertes | 205,487,134 Bücher! | Menüleiste: Immer sichtbar