在工作当中，你会有以下的困惑吗：如何才能在世俗的工作中活出信仰？怎样与没有共同价值观和职业道德的人共事？如何与从事不道德商业活动的老板相处？当信仰与工作发生冲突时，你选择前者还是后者？

约翰·贝克特先生将带领你发现自己的天赋、认清天职，教会你如何将信仰和工作融为一体，让你在工作中荣神益人。

明白天职真义：不陷入成功学陷阱，不逃避现代商业社会的挑战和责任。

效法历史伟人：学习摩西，大卫，但以理，尼希米的管理智慧，借鉴现代商界领袖的成功典范，帮助你在工作中得胜，活出丰盛的生命。

打磨“五块光滑石子”：标竿式目标，合乎中道的价值观，爱人如己的管理，管家式的经营理念，仆人式的带领。

在工作中与上帝建立亲密的个人关系：以全面和深入的方式将圣经原则应用于商业情境，在工作场所彰显上帝的国。

目录：

前言
第一部分 我的个人历程
火窑中的试炼
融合两个世界
第二部分 旅途中的良伴
引言
最早的良友——从亚当到波阿斯
圣经智慧的今日应用——大卫和所罗门
世界级的领导——但以理和尼希米
新约中的工作与职场——耶稣及跟随者
文明的边沿
第三部分 蒙福的职场日程
引言
目标的力量
价值观
尊重个人
管家
事奉
后记

Vlot te lezen. Bizar verhaal: 2 mannen zijn op zoek naar ?... Door de regen stappend naar de stad en dan naar de buiten en weerom terug, zijn ze het vaak niet met elkaar eens, voeren erg bizarre gesprekken, vergeten de paraplu te openen, verliezen hun bezittingen, gaan nadien ernaar op zoek, frequenteren ze cafés, vermoorden tussendoor een politieagent, lopen verloren in de donkerte, laten elkaar achter en vinden mekaar weer terug. Uitgeput gaan ze op een tweesprong uiteindelijk elk hun richting uit...
Het verhaal wordt verteld op een zakelijke en toch humoristische, eerder bizarre wijze. Genietbaar!!
Dit boek verwijst onrechtstreeks naar en vindt zijn inspiratie in verschillende literaire meesterwerken.
Beckett 's stijl is in dit werk anders dan we gewoon zijn; blijkbaar met de betrachting om onder de invloedssfeer van J. Joyce uit te komen (dixit: nawoord). ( )

Yet another work I feel conflicted about because although I am very partial to the ideas presented here, there’s something about Beckett's writing that throws me off and makes it hard for me to enjoy this short novel as much as I feel I should. I can’t blame it on the translation as Beckett himself translated it back to English from his original French text. Which is not to say I didn’t find humor in various passages. It’s just that the writing overall felt alienating in some way.

And yet I haven’t been able to stop thinking of Mercier and Camier because much like Bellow’s The Dangling Man the main ideas and thoughts that Beckett is trying to convey resonate with me on a deep level. Because much like The Dangling Man this seems to be a story about what happens when all assumptions and projects and beliefs that humans once held as given are seen to be non-existent. The basic anchor to hang this all on is Existentialism’s “God is Dead,” but this crisis in modern thought branches out to so much more than the strictly religious. This feels like Beckett’s absurd next step past Camus and Dostoevsky.

What happens to us when our drive to progress and proceed finds no solid direction to progress or proceed in?

At one time in our much distant past we must have felt perfectly alright to just exist without goals or beliefs or purpose, but this time is long gone. Religion and Science and Humanity’s Progress has ingrained in us a sense of purpose, enlightenment and drive, originally based on God, but then even on our own exalted sense of Humanism. And yet, what if the drive remains but no agreed upon or even discernible goal or foundation or "higher good” remains to be seen or believed in? What then?

Well, we might find ourselves wandering around aimlessly like Mercier and Camier! ( )

This one was another miss from Beckett for me. There was not really anything stringing, and structuring, the narrative along and I felt that the entire thing lacked focus and refinement. Despite the aplomb dished out for this, I didn't quite care for it and felt that it did not have much to offer. It is not my type of book.

2 stars. ( )

This is a great story peppered with humor, laughter and wink. A book that I can highly recommend.
[[Beckett]] proves his high linguistic ability. Mercier and Camier are on the move, constantly pondering on trifles such as who was at a meeting point first, about the sense and nonsense of an umbrella, about friendship and what happened to the bike. There is a steady language exchange between the two at the highest level, which often made me laugh. ( )