Vittorio Hösle
Autor von Eine kurze Geschichte der deutschen Philosophie: Rückblick auf den deutschen Geist
Über den Autor
Vittorio Hosle is Paul G. Kimball Chair of Arts and Letters in the Department of German Languages & Literatures, concurrent professor of philosophy, and concurrent professor of political science at the University of Notre Dame.
Werke von Vittorio Hösle
Eine kurze Geschichte der deutschen Philosophie: Rückblick auf den deutschen Geist (2013) 44 Exemplare
Die Krise der Gegenwart und die Verantwortung der Philosophie. Transzendentalpragmatik, Letztbegründung, Ethik (1990) 9 Exemplare
Hegels System : der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität. - 2,. erw. Aufl.,… (1987) 8 Exemplare
O Café Dos Filósofos Mortos 3 Exemplare
Dantes Commedia und Goethes Faust: Ein Vergleich der beiden wichtigsten philosophischen Dichtungen Europas (2014) 3 Exemplare
Il compimento della tragedia nell'opera tarda di Sofocle: osservazioni storico-estetiche sulla struttura della tragedia… (1986) 3 Exemplare
Wahrheit und Geschichte: Studien zur Struktur der Philosophiegeschichte unter paradigmatischer Analyse der Entwicklung… (1984) 3 Exemplare
Per una lettura non riduttiva di Platone (Diotima. Questioni di filosofia e politica) (2017) 1 Exemplar
Die Rangordnung der drei griechischen Tragiker : ein Problem aus der Geschichte der Poetik als Lackmustest… (2009) 1 Exemplar
Contro lo scetticismo per la filosofia 1 Exemplar
Recht und Geschichte bei Giambattista Vico 1 Exemplar
Platonismus und Darwinismus 1 Exemplar
Zugehörige Werke
The Other Plato: The Tübingen Interpretation of Plato's Inner-Academic Teachings (2012) — Mitwirkender — 5 Exemplare
Getagged
Wissenswertes
- Gebräuchlichste Namensform
- Hösle, Vittorio
- Geburtstag
- 1960-06-25
- Geschlecht
- male
- Nationalität
- Germany
- Geburtsort
- Milan, Italy
- Berufe
- philosopher
university professor - Organisationen
- University of Notre Dame
Mitglieder
Rezensionen
Dir gefällt vielleicht auch
Nahestehende Autoren
Statistikseite
- Werke
- 46
- Auch von
- 3
- Mitglieder
- 239
- Beliebtheit
- #94,925
- Bewertung
- 4.0
- Rezensionen
- 1
- ISBNs
- 85
- Sprachen
- 8
But I for one did read it cover to cover, and in my opinion parts 1 (Normative Foundations, 200 pages) and 3 (Political Ethics, 300 pages) are good, although part 3 could well have been shortened a bit. These parts form an engaging discussion of morals and politics where the emphasis is clearly philosophical in part 1 and practical in part 3. I particularly enjoyed the argument for considering political ethics the central part of ethics (p.70-72), the justifications for interculturally valid ethics (p.176-180) and the discussion of natural and positive law (p.632-634). The author shows a good touch for putting moral philosophy to practice, although in part 3 he certainly takes the scenery route by discussing just about every political topic imaginable.
In any case parts 1 and 3 lived up to my expectations for this book, so I have no complaints there. But for some reason this book also contains part 2, "Foundations of a theory of the social world", which is by far the longest (400+ pages). It's a collection of thoughts on man, society, power and the state, but unfortunately it's almost entirely detached from parts 1 and 3. A few connections are made here and there, but they are quite obvious and could just as well have been included as endnotes for parts 1 and 3.
The great majority of part 2 staggers on far beyond morals and politics with a troubling lack of focus and purpose. The author moves from game theory to rules of power to world history - beginning with hunter-gatherers, no less! His lack of judgment is baffling - it simply does not make any sense to include this much disparate material in one book. An equally big problem is that his style is much too verbose. He often seems to ramble on about any given topic for ten pages without arriving at any conclusions whatsoever. And finally, there is really nothing theoretical about part 2 so its title is quite misleading.
But I don't mean to be too critical. Parts 1 and 3 of this book are good. Nevertheless as I was reading part 3 I felt disappointed. Here we have all these plans for promoting justice, reducing poverty, preserving the environment etc., and for once they are supported by solid moral argumentation instead of simplifying rhetoric. But who's going to read them when they're buried somewhere around page 900 of an unnecessarily bloated book? If you're thinking "nobody", then you're probably not far from the right answer. And that's a shame.… (mehr)