Ein Porträt des Künstlers als junger Mann (1916)

Very interesting story, once you get past Joyce's intricate use of vocabulary and grammar (you can see precursors to Ulysseys in the grammatical structure). In terms of plot, it was reminiscent of Catcher in the Rye, although Stephen Daedelus is not a whiny, self-absorbed Holden Caulfield, in terms of seeing a semi-quasi-autobiographical sketch of the development of the author from childhood to the brink of manhood. Daedelus's struggles are more serious, more religious, more existential. In all, a much more enjoyable read than Catcher. ( )

How should one review a great classic novel that has stimulated so much analysis and criticism that the paperback version in our library contained more pages devoted to analysis than to the novel itself? I’ll just describe how it affected me personally since I am unlikely to add much to the enormous existing corpus of literary commentary.

I read the book first when I was a freshman at the University of Notre Dame. There I first encountered James Joyce’s semi-stream-of-consciousness technique, which made for quite challenging reading for a college freshman but very enjoyable for a grizzled old lawyer and graduate of a “Great Books” program. This semi-autobiography of Joyce resonated a great deal with my own experience of growing up in the Catholic Church.

The book is a growing up and coming-of-age story about Stephen Dedalus, who would also feature in Joyce’s tour de force, Ulysses. Stephen has to establish his individuality apart from the tentacles of family, religion, and country, then - and until quite recently - in the throes of political upheaval.

Stephen argues with family and with friends at college, and this enables us to experience his thoughts on Irish nationalism, poetry, art, sex, and more basically, what he wanted to do with his life. For me, the passage that provide the most fun was the description of a Jesuit’s fire and brimstone description of hell. For one unacquainted with this sort of thing, the passage might read as parody. But I know better: that old Jesuit’s tirade was almost exactly the same sermon I heard 50 years after the book was published at a religious “retreat” that my Catholic high school required me to attend.

Occasionally, Joyce gets carried away with his own extraordinary ability to compose complicated syntax employing his sesquipedalian vocabulary. Like William Faulkner, he sometimes seems to be just showing off. But there are aspects of life that he really, really gets: like the great relief a true believer experiences when his mortal sins are washed away through the sacrament of confession (technically, “Penance”). He also has a meticulously authentic ear for English spoken by Irishmen.

Evaluation: I think this is one of the great novels in English that all truly educated people should read at least once.

(JAB) ( )

To be honest, I'm so confused. I don't understand what I just read. ( )

"What did it avail to pray when he knew that his soul lusted after its own destruction?"

1. Readability: 6/10
2. Atmosphere: 7/10
3. Character Depth: 10/10
4. Philosophical Depth: 10/10
5. Personal Connection: 10/10
6. Entertainment: 6/10
7. Payoff, Afterglow : 7/10

Overall: 8/10

1.1 — 2.2 ⭐
2.3 — 4.5 ⭐⭐
4.6 — 6.9 ⭐⭐⭐
7 — 8.9 ⭐⭐⭐⭐
9 — 10 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ( )

Not an easy read. It took Joyce 10 years to write, and it shows.The prose doesn't really flow. But there are other rewards. It's like Joyce is writing in the style of an impressionist painter - the objective is convey a general impression, a feeling, rather than to be explicit and direct. Once the reader accepts this contract with the author, things move along better!
In the end I had a vivid picture of a difficult childhood, with a father falling apart with drink, a mother struggling with the loss of faith of her son, and the author gaining the confidence to rebel against conventional expectations.
Good stuff, but just not an easy read! ( )